I believe the answer is Canaan
When the occasion calls for “full” dress uniform. Normally this would be formal occasions. Not all awards have medals
<h3>What is
formal occasions?</h3>
A formal occasion is distinguished by form or ceremony. designed for use or wear at formal occasions or events involving elaborate ceremony or prescribed social observance: Tuxedos and full-length gowns were among the formal attire.
Formal Events are defined as communication events or activities identified as opportunities for the Minister of Environment, or designate, to participate. ECCC Communications must prepare a message event proposal for these events.
A formal event is typically associated with a ceremony. People arrive dressed formally and according to protocol. Typically, these events have a set guest list. When you have an informal event, it usually does not follow event protocols or a formal dress code.
To know more about formal occasions follow the link:
brainly.com/question/23736260
#SPJ4
I was just shaken by the crest of a large motorboat, all of us tiny particles in the water are scared. The vibration was like 3 huge earthquakes all at once right under us. Since the boat was gone past the gigantic crest has sent very large waves over us. As the boat moved farther away the waves started to decrease in size. I think this happened because the waves can only last for so long!
I believe the answer is: <span>c. the clancys are experiencing higher levels of marital satisfaction than the mckavicks are.
Based on the research of marital satisfaction, most couple who grow old together to the point when they've acquired grandchildren are typically more satisfied with their marriage compared to younger couples.
This happen because in order to stay together that long, couples need a high compatibility level.</span>
The Green Party candidate Ralph Nader (in)famously is part of the 2000 election because many people think that he siphoned votes from the Democrat candidate (Al Gore) which may have been a factor in Gore's defeat.
Here's a simplified view of what I mean. Let's say there are 100 people total. Now let's say the election is very close at 50 50. If any one person changes their vote, then the winner is decided. If a third party enters the race, then one of the original candidates will have their vote split. If Gore had 50 votes, but then lost say 20 of them to Nader, then he'll be left with 30 after all is said and done. Bush will still have 50 votes and this leads him to win the election.
Note: Gore won the popular vote, but lost the electoral college. The electoral college is the true deciding body that determines the president.
So based on the second paragraph, that's just one simplified example of how a third party effectively "spoils" the race. Of course, many could easily argue that a third party (or many more parties) is actually a good thing because it encourages many voices to join the political arena. Those advocates would say that having 2 parties leads to stagnation and lack of growth, not to mention lack of representation of everyone.
In short, many people think the third party candidate Ralph Nader redirected votes away from Al Gore which may have cost him the election. However, there may be other factors that contributed.