Two reasons as to why the claim is not credible because there is no exact proof in regards with the article that has been forwarded to and there is no validity of which it has been studied and experimented on in which will tell whether the claim should be credible.
I'm really sorry. I would love to help you, but I am having a hard time comprehending your question.
The second amendment gives people the right to own guns. The third amendment basically states that you can’t force people to house soldiers (more relevant in the older times). So, obviously the amendment we are dealing with here is the second amendment. A city or state is not allowed to ban something that is protected by the amendments, and having and owning a hand gun is protected by the second amendment (with a license). Therefore, the city of Chicago violated the second amendment. Your answer would be A.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
for a different version of answers it will be, "Encouraging citizens to vote"
Explanation:just answered on apex
