1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
amm1812
4 years ago
6

Barnes and Noble lost its market share in book retailing to Amazon. It tried to regain market share by offering a similar electr

onic reader, the Nook, to the Amazon Kindle series. This demonstrates that Barnes and Noble lacked:________.
A. a short-term strategy.
B. a company-wide strategy.
C. a sustainable competitive advantage.
D. good suppliers.
Business
1 answer:
Semmy [17]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C. a sustainable competitive advantage.

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this demonstrates that Barnes and Noble lacked a sustainable competitive advantage. This term refers to a condition that allows a company to be in a superior business position within a market. Which, since they had to lost market share to Amazon and had to offer them a product it means they lost their competitive advantage to them.

You might be interested in
What companies aren't like McDonald's? look them up or share the story and nutritional value.
Alexxandr [17]
What do you mean as 'Not like McDonald's'? Do you mean fast food or what? 
8 0
4 years ago
Harold and Maude are married and live in a common-law state. Neither has made any taxable gifts and Maude owns (holds title to)
Lilit [14]

Answer:

estate tax  due of Harold and Maude = $5,440,000

Explanation:

Taxable estate and cumulative transfers = $ 25,000,000

Tax on cumulative transfers = $9,945,800

   =24000000*40%+345800

Unified credit - 2019 = $4,505,800

Estate Tax Due = $5,440,000

Gross Estate = $ 25,000,000

Exclusion = $ 11,400,000

Taxable Amount = $ 13,600,000

Effective Tax Rate = 40%

Estate Tax Due = $5,440,000

4 0
4 years ago
Identify whether each of the following statements best illustrates the concept of consumer surplus, producer surplus, or neither
WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

a. Producer surplus

b. Neither

c. Consumer surplus

Explanation:

The producer surplus is the difference between the minimum price a producer is willing to accept for a product and the price he actually gets.  

The consumer surplus is the difference between the maximum price a consumer is willing to pay for a product and the price he actually gets.  

a. Here, the person gets $189 for his laptop but he was willing to accept $180 as well. This is an example of producer surplus. The producer surplus, in this case, is $9.  

b. In this example, we only know the price that the producer actually received and the price the consumer actually paid. The maximum price the consumer was willing to pay or the minimum price that the producer was willing to accept is not mentioned. So this is neither an example of producer surplus nor consumer surplus.  

c. Here, the consumer was willing to pay $47 for a sweater, but he actually has to pay $40. This is an example of consumer surplus. The consumer surplus is equal to $7.

3 0
3 years ago
Under the Uniform Securities Act, which of the following negates a client's right to a civil suit for damages?
mart [117]

Answer:

C) I only.

Explanation:

According to the Uniform Securities Act, A civil case underneath the provisions of the United States must be filed in 3 years of the alleged infringement, or 2 years from the detection of the breach, whatever comes first.

Also, The passing of the consultant or the client doesn't really eliminate a civil liability prima facie case. Waivers to statements agreed to sign by the customer waiving adherence by the consultant with the provisions of this act on which the suit is focused aren't ever legitimate on the examination.

Therefore the option i is correct

8 0
3 years ago
Palencia Paints Corporation has a target capital structure of 35% debt and 65% common equity, with no preferred stock. Its befor
Eva8 [605]

Answer:

(A) Cost of equity= 15.74%

(B) WACC = 12.86%

Explanation:

Palencia paint corporation has a 35% debt from it's target capital structure and 65% common equity

The before-tax cost debt is 10%

Marginal tax rate is 25%

Po is $22.00

Do is $2.25

Constant rate(g) is 5%

(A) The cost of common equity can be calculated as follows

= [Do(1+g)/Po] + g

=[2.25(1+0.05)/22] + 5%

= [2.25(1.05)/22] + 5%

= 2.3625/22 + 5%

= 0.1074+5%

= 0.1074×100+5%

= 10.74%+5%

Cost of equity = 15.74%

(B) The WACC can be calculated as follows

= weight of debt×after-tax cost of debt + weight of equity×cost of equity

= (35%)(10%)(1-25%) + (65%)(15.74%)

= (35%)(10%)(1-0.25) + (65%)(15.74%)

=(35%)(10%)(0.75) + (65%)(15.74%)

= 2.63% + 10.23%

= 12.86%

Hence the cost of equity is 15.74% and the WACC is 12.86%

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • 2. Which of the following steps will help you from overdrawing your bank account?
    9·2 answers
  • Refer to the following selected financial information from McCormik, LLC. Compute the company's acid-test ratio for Year 2. Year
    13·1 answer
  • The ______, authorized by the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, is charged with writing and enforc
    8·1 answer
  • Suppose aggregate consumer spending equals $5,000 when aggregate disposable income is zero. Furthermore, suppose that when dispo
    13·1 answer
  • A giant telecommunications company that was previously owned by the government of Sunzabia, a European country, is sold to an in
    6·1 answer
  • The economy is populated by 100 agents. Each agent has to divide 1 unit of time
    12·1 answer
  • Congress adopted a law to provide insurance to protect wheat farmers. The agency in charge of the program adopted regulations to
    11·1 answer
  • Help! Select the qualification that is best demonstrated in each example.
    15·2 answers
  • The ____________________ attests to the fairness of the presentation of the financial statements and states whether the financia
    9·1 answer
  • in some industries, technology drives globalization because the economies of scale necessary to reduce costs cannot be met by co
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!