Answer:
Australia has purchasing-power parity with the U.S.
Explanation:
A basket of goods costs $800 in the US. The same basket costs 1,000 euros in France and 960 Australian dollars in Australia.
The nominal exchange rate for euros is .80 euros per U.S. dollar and for Australian dollars, it is 1.2 Australian dollars per U.S. dollar.
The purchasing power parity theory compares the currency of two countries through a basket of goods. The currency of the two countries is in equilibrium or is at par if a basket of goods cost the same in both the countries.
This method compares the economic productivity and standard of living in two countries.
Converting the value of basket in France into US dollars,
= 
= $1,250
Converting the value of basket in Australia into US dollars,
= 
= $800
The cost of the basket of goods is same in Australia. This indicates that Australia has purchasing-power parity with the U.S.
Explanation:
Strategic management is an evolution and a destination due to the fact that the organizational strategy is developed in pursuit of objectives and goals. This means that action plans for achieving goals can be changed according to internal or external interference.
A company's strategy is not inert, so strategic management will be carried out according to the market situation, the internal environment and other variables, so that there is monitoring, organization and strategic coordination of the company according to its environment.
Answer:
D. layoffs
Explanation:
A contingency plan is an alternative plan of action in case of unexpected outcomes. It is devised and kept in place to be implemented in bad times. A contingency plan is a sort of a risk mitigation plan to help the business navigate through a bad situation efficiently.
A contingency plan for labor include measures that can help a business overcome tough seasons. The business may need to layoff some employees to save on labor in times of economic downtime
Answer:
Asset U
Explanation:
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset Q = Expected return / standard deviation
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset Q = 6.5% / 5.5%
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset Q = 1.1818
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset U = Expected return / standard deviation
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset U = 8.8% / 5.5%
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset U = 1.6
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset B = Expected return / standard deviation
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset B = 8.8% / 6.5%
Reward-to-volatility ratio for Asset B = 1.3538
The investor should prefer Asset U because its has the highest reward to volatility ratio among the three options.
Answer:
E. property damage auto 5. pays if insured is at fault and someone else's-
property is damaged
