Answer:
The conclusion "T" logically follows from the premises given and the argument is valid
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us use notations to represent the steps
P: I take a bus
Q: I take the subway
R: I will be late for my appointment
S: I take a taxi
T: I will be broke
The given statement in symbolic form can be written as,
(P V Q) → R
S → (¬R ∧ T)
(¬Q ∧ ¬P) → S
¬R
___________________
∴ T
PROOF:
1. (¬Q ∧ ¬P) → S Premise
2. S → (¬R ∧ T) Premise
3. (¬Q ∧ ¬P) → (¬R ∧ T) (1), (2), Chain Rule
4. ¬(P ∨ Q) → (¬R ∧ T) (3), DeMorgan's law
5. (P ∨ Q) → R Premise
6. ¬R Premise
7. ¬(P ∨ Q) (5), (6), Modus Tollen's rule
8. ¬R ∧ T (4), (7), Modus Ponen's rule
9. T (8), Rule of Conjunction
Therefore the conclusion "T" logically follows from the given premises and the argument is valid.
Answer:
w = 5
Step-by-step explanation:
(26+4)=30, and 30/6=5, therefore, w = 5.
Answer:
Apparently i cant see the photo im am so sorry but do need pints.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is your answer and for the multiplication I gave it to you step by step
Answer:
x = Infinite answers.
y = Infinite answers.
Step-by-step explanation:
x + y = 3
2x + 2y = 6
2x + 2y = 6
2x + 2y = 6
=> Therefore, x and y have infinite values that can fit the equation.
Hoped this helped.
