In the past, developmentalists believed that human intelligence is Static, whereas now it is commonly understood that intelligence is malleable.
Human intelligence:
- The capacity to learn from experience, adapt to novel circumstances, comprehend and manage abstract concepts, and apply information to influence one's surroundings are all components of human intelligence.
- Humans are cognitively capable of learning, forming concepts, understanding, applying logic and reason, as well as the capacities to recognize patterns, plan, innovate, solve problems, make decisions, retain information, and use language to communicate. These abilities are all a part of intelligence.
- Humans are often regarded as the most intellectual species on the planet; humans possess large brains that are superior to those of other animals in terms of processing speed and cognitive ability. In actuality, during millions of years of evolution, humans have demonstrated a tremendous growth in brain size and intelligence.
Learn more about human intelligence here brainly.com/question/16543469
#SPJ4
Explanation:
Make sure to edit the words on this
the death of Jesus and the Rise of Christianity shocked the stability and loyalty of the people of the roman empire to its core. Its what many historians consider the beginning of the end of the Romans.
This is an example of ascribed status.
She was ascribed, or given the status of 'heiress to the Trump fortune' just by being born. She didn't really do much in order to achieve her goal of gaining that fortune but was rather just gifted the fortune upon her birth. Her gaining that status was not a voluntary decision.
They wore loose, tunic-like clothing. So the answer is A.
The answer is b. Civil court because it isn’t a criminal matter so they wouldn’t go to criminal court meaning it can’t be a they are neighbors not family members so they wouldn’t go to family court so it isn’t c and it isn’t d because in order to go to appeals court you have to have already gone to court and the prompt does not state that they are appealing the verdict of a previous court case
