The Kyoto Treaty does not undermine the United States sovereignty because it does not have anything to do with such. It was a treaty that asks committing State parties to reduce greenhouse gas emissions because global warming does exist and it is caused by CO2 productions done by human activities.
A teenager who has a history of achalasia will likely complain of Excessive heartburn in clinical manifestations.
<h3>What does it mean if you have constant heartburn?</h3>
If you have frequent or constant heartburn (more than twice a week or heartburn every day), you may have gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). GERD is a digestive disorder that affects the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), a muscle that connects the esophagus and the stomach.
Heartburn can have causes that aren't due to underlying disease. Examples include spicy food, alcohol, overeating, or tight clothing. An occasional bout of heartburn usually means that the foods the person ate produced too much acid in the stomach.
To learn more about gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) visit the link
brainly.com/question/14339327
#SPJ4
Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin
Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.
- Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
- Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
- Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
- Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
- The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.
Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.
Most likely balance of power
