Answer:
A
Explanation:
Both passages set up that the story itself is dangerous, with the parents in the first one confiscating the magazine, trying to protect the author from getting involved. The second one shows the danger by explaining that even writing something fictional based off of the topic could endanger the author and their family.
Answer:
You usually state the other sides argument, you then would state your argument and how it is the most logical solution
Explanation:
Answer:
Green’s argument uses effective rhetoric by using these components of rhetoric to create an argument that appeals to the audience.
Green establishes ethos by stating that the Equal pay bill is being considered by the Utah legislature. This infers that he has information on the legislature, and/or could be a part of it, firming his credibility.
Then, Green uses logos by showing you how the turn of events will happen if the Equal pay bill is accepted and enforced: “if businesses are forced to pay women the same as male earnings, that means they will have to reduce the pay for the men they employ". "If that happens, then men will have an even more difficult time earning enough to support their families”.
Finally, Green wraps it up by using pathos: “We should encourage our legislators to drop the whole notion. Let the marketplace determine what free-market forces should prevail. It is not the role of the government to dictate to businesses what they should pay anyway, either as a Minimum Wage or Equal pay for men and women.
Explanation:
Give the brainliest
