1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marshall27 [118]
3 years ago
15

Listed below are the weights in pounds of 11 players randomly selected from the roster of the Seattle Sea-hawks when they won Su

per Bowl XLVIII (the same players from the preceding exercise). Are the measures of variation likely to be typical of all NFL players? 1. 1892. 2543. 2354. 2255. 1906. 3057. 1958. 2029. 19010. 25211. 305

Mathematics
1 answer:
weeeeeb [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

No. These measures show a thinner team of NFL players according to the mean, variance, standard deviation, and quartiles.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) The measures of variation, namely The Range, Variance, Quartiles, Interquartiles, Sum of Squares, etc. shows us how the data are dispersed.

The Range Δ is calculated:

\Delta =305-189=116 Maximum value - Minimum value for weight

Mean:

\bar{x}=\frac{189+254+235+225+190+305+202+190+252+305}{11}\approx 231.09 \:pounds

Variance:

s^{2}=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n} (x_i-\bar{x})^{2}}{n-1}\Rightarrow s=1923.69\\

The Standard Deviation of the sample

s=\sqrt{s^{^{2}}}\Rightarrow s\approx 43.86\\

2) Since there is no preceding exercise, the comparison was made to a recent study in which a NFL player average weight is about 245 pounds (average),

Since 25% of this list are player whose weight is 192.5 lbs and 50% (2nd Quartile) =225 lbs , finally only at the 3rd Quartile we have players above the regular NFL average with 253. This, added with the other data, allow us to say that this list is not a typical of all NFL players.

You might be interested in
Solve ... 5x + 4 < 3 - 3x
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]
X< - 1/8 let me know if Uu need work
6 0
3 years ago
2 1/3 + 3/7 divided by 2 1/3 x 1 3/7​
oee [108]

Answer: \frac{29}{35}

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Make sure all your denominators are the same, you can do this by multiplying them all by 3 or 7, 2 and 1/3 would become 2 7/21, 3/7 would become 9/21, 2 and 1/3, would become 2 and 7/21, and so on and so forth, leaving us with

2\frac{7}{21}+\frac{9}{21} / 2\frac{7}{21} * 1\frac{9}{21}

2. Now, I would go and solve each side of the equation because we divide them, we can add 2\frac{7}{21} and \frac{9}{21}  together to get  2\frac{16}{21}, because 7 + 9 = 16

2\frac{16}{21} / 2\frac{7}{21} * 1\frac{9}{21}

3. We can do the same thing to the other side, by multiplying the two of them. I'm going to convert both of them to just fractions, 2\frac{7}{21} becomes \frac{49}{21} and 1\frac{9}{21} becomes \frac{30}{21}

\frac{49}{21} *  \frac{30}{21}

Now we can reduce them, and for our first fraction divide the top and bottom by 7, giving us  \frac{7}{3} and the second one by 3, which gives us  \frac{10}{7}

\frac{7}{3} * \frac{10}{7} now we cross divide, where we replace the 7's with ones because they're right across from each other to get  \frac{1}{3} and  \frac{10}{1}, or just 10.

\frac{1}{3} * 10 =  \frac{10}{3}

4. So now we can do a similar thing with the first half of our equation and convert it into a fraction and not a mixed number.

\frac{58}{21} / \frac{10}{3}

Now we multiply divide them, and the easiest way I learned how to do this was by keep the first fraction in its place, and flipping the denominator and numerator of the second, and multiplying them.

so   \frac{58}{21} * \frac{3}{10} which if we multiply both sides, you get \frac{174}{210}

I'll save you some times and simplify it for you, the greatest common factor is 6 so we divide the top and bottom by 6 to get

\frac{29}{35}

4 0
2 years ago
How this concepts are used in different situations?​
andriy [413]

Answer:

Positive thinking is all of mind also positive

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
(08.02)The ages of several trees in a neighborhood are shown below:
vesna_86 [32]
The answer is 12.4 :)


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A recipe called for the ratio of sugar to flour to be 10 : 3 if you used 70 ounce of sugar how many ounces of flour would type n
scZoUnD [109]

10 : 3 goes to 70 : x

How to solve? Well...

What gets you from 10 to 70 using multiplication?

70 divided by 10 is 7. So... 7!

So multiply the ratio by 7.

10 : 3 turns into 70 : 21

If you used 70 ounces of sugar, you would need to use <u>21 ounces of flour.</u>

<u></u>

⭐ Answered by Hyperrspace (Ace) ⭐

⭐ Brainliest would be appreciated, I'm trying to reach genius! ⭐

⭐ If you have questions, leave a comment, I'm happy to help! ⭐

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The independent-samples t testResearch Scenario: A forensic psychologist has developed a new program that teaches empathy and po
    5·1 answer
  • A local animal feed company makes its feed by the ton, which is 2000 pounds. They want to include a medication in the feed. Each
    12·1 answer
  • Which equation below represents the inverse function B(a) , which takes the trapezoid's area as input and returns as output the
    8·2 answers
  • What is the better buy? 1.50 for 5 oz 1.20 for 3 oz
    8·1 answer
  • Eva was driving down a road and after 4 hours she had traveled 90 miles. At this
    12·1 answer
  • 375/1000 of 1 m? Maths homework is always the hardest
    12·1 answer
  • If you answer this i will give you 100 points and brainliest
    9·2 answers
  • In a partial variation, the value of<br> is constant.<br> X<br> True<br> False
    15·1 answer
  • What is the value of x in the equation 3(2x + 8) =0
    8·1 answer
  • Which equation has roots -3 and 4
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!