1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Harman [31]
3 years ago
15

In unit pricing, the total value of the contract is a function of the quantities needed to complete the work.

Business
1 answer:
disa [49]3 years ago
6 0
This statement is true. Unit pricing can be used in different types of contracts to require the purchaser to pay a supplier a predetermine amount per unit of product or service. The function of the quantities needed to complete the work is total value of the contract.<span> </span>
You might be interested in
Assume an analyst has been hired to estimate the price elasticity of demand for hamburger (which sells for about $2.30 per pound
Pepsi [2]

Answer:

The correct answer is B

Explanation:

Price elasticity of the demand evaluates the demand responsiveness after the change or variation in the product own price.

The formula for computing the coefficient of price elasticity, is the factors which affect the elasticity and also elasticity is vital for business when deciding the prices.

So, Filet mignon(F) sells for $20 per pound when compared to that of hamburger (H) which sells the product for $2.30 per pound. F have the higher price as compare to the H, therefore, the coefficient of the price elasticity of demand in absolute value will be high or larger for F than that of H.

6 0
3 years ago
Grand Lips produces a lip balm used for​ cold-weather sports. The balm is manufactured in a single processing department. No lip
77julia77 [94]

Answer:

a. see attachment

b.

total equivalent units : Materials = 30,500 units and Conversion Costs = 16,860

cost per equivalent unit : Materials = $0.14 and Conversion Costs = $0.30

c.

(a) units completed and transferred to Finished Goods = $6,732

(b) units still in process at June 30 = $1,196

d.

<u>Journals</u>

Work In Process :Direct Materials $4,305 (debit)

Raw Materials $4,305 (credit)

<em>Being Raw Materials used in Production</em>

Work In Process :Direct Labor  $3,320 (debit)

Salaries Payable $3,320  (credit)

<em>Being Labor used in Production</em>

Work In Process ; Overheads $1,738 (debit)

Overheads $1,738 (credit)

<em>Being Overheads Assigned to Production</em>

Finished Goods $6,732 (debit)

Work In Process $6,732 (credit)

<em>Being Units transferred to Finished Goods</em>

Explanation:

<u>Calculation of Equivalent units of Production in respect with Raw Materials and Conversion Costs</u>

1. Materials

Ending Work In Process (5,200 × 100%)                                         5,200

Completed and Transferred Out (15,300 × 100%)                         15,300

Equivalent units of Production in respect with Raw Materials     30,500

2. Conversion Costs

Ending Work In Process (5,200 × 30%)                                            1,560

Completed and Transferred Out (15,300 × 100%)                         15,300

Equivalent units of Production in respect with Conversion Cost 16,860

<u>Calculation of Cost per Equivalent unit of production  in respect with Raw Materials and Conversion Costs</u>

Unit Cost = Total Cost ÷ Total Equivalent units

1. Materials

Unit Cost =  $4,305 ÷ 30,500

                = $0.14

2. Conversion Costs

Unit Cost =  ($3,320 + $1,738) ÷ 16,860

                = $0.30

3. Total unit cost

Total unit cost = Material Cost + Conversion Cost

                        = $0.14 + $0.30

                        = $0.44

<u>Calculation of costs assigned to (a) units completed and transferred to Finished Goods and (b) units still in process at June 30.</u>

(a) units completed and transferred to Finished Goods

Total Cost = units completed and transferred out × total unit cost

                 = 15,300 × $0.44

                 = $6,732

(b) units still in process at June 30.

Total Cost = Materials Cost + Conversion Cost

                 = $0.14 × 5,200 + $0.30 × 1,560

                 = $1,196

8 0
3 years ago
Suppose a farmer in Georgia begins to grow peaches. He uses​ $1,000,000 in savings to purchase​ land, he rents equipment for ​$1
mina [271]

Answer:

-$475,000

Explanation:

Total revenue = Baskets of peaches × Price

                       = 100,000 × $3

                       = $300,000

Explicit cost:

= Rent equipment + wages

= $100,000 + $100,000

= $200,000

Implicit cost:

= Land × Interest + salesman earned

=  $1,000,000 × 0.55 + $25,000

= $575,000

Total cost = Explicit cost: + Implicit cost

                = $200,000 + $575,000

                = $775,000

Economic profit = Total revenue - Total cost

                           = $300,000 - $775,000

                           = -$475,000

8 0
3 years ago
Daniel has decided to open his own bakery using locally sourced ingredients and supplies. He provides income and jobs to local s
Svetllana [295]

Answer:

This is an example of Invisible Hand.

Explanation:

The invisible hand concept describes the individual effort in providing benefit to overall society by his untiring efforts. The market force that helps the demand and supply of goods in a free market to reach equilibrium automatically and providing benefits to its own people.

6 0
3 years ago
Last year, the Miller Company reported a return on assets of 15 percent and an asset turnover of 1.6. In the current year, the c
Tema [17]

Answer:

b. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to increase. If total assets increased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to increase.

Explanation:

The options are as follows

a. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to decrease. If total assets decreased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to increase.

b. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to increase. If total assets increased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to increase.

c. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to decrease. If total assets decreased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to decrease.

d. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to increase. If total assets increased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to decrease.

Let us assume the sales is $100,000

So, the asset turnover equal to

Asset turnover = Sales ÷ Total Assets

1.6 = $100,000 ÷ Total assets

Total assets = $62,500

Now the return on assets equal to

Return on assets = Profit ÷ Total Assets

15% = Profit ÷ $62,500

So, the profit is $9,375

Now in the current year

The asset turnover equal to

Asset turnover = Sales ÷ Total Assets

1.2 = $100,000 ÷ Total assets

Total assets = $83,333.33

Now the return on assets equal to

Return on assets = Profit ÷ Total Assets

19% = Profit ÷ $83,333.33

So, the profit is $15,833.33

Now the increase in asset and profit is

Increase in asset = ($83,333.33 - $62,500) ÷ (62500)

= 33.33%

And, the increase in profit is

= ($15,833.33,- $9,375) ÷ ($9,375)

= 68.89%

As we can see that the increase in asset decreased but at the same time the increase in profit increases that results in increases in total assets and the increment in return on assets.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The local board of education wants to prohibit students from bringing cell phones to school. What new evidence might be
    11·2 answers
  • When it comes to saving money, what is a good rule of thumb?
    11·1 answer
  • Greenbelt Construction has been a successful small home-building firm for years. The owner pays subcontractors slightly more tha
    9·1 answer
  • On may 1, newtown motors, a used-car dealer, wrote a letter to o'reilly, which stated, "we have a 1969 pontiac firebird in mint
    14·1 answer
  • Dan​ Jacobs, production manager for​ GreenLife, invested in​ computer-controlled production machinery last year. He purchased th
    11·1 answer
  • order for the auto parts shop is $80; the holding cost of carrying 1 unit is $1.2 per year. The shop has 360 working days per ye
    12·2 answers
  • Cushenberry Corporation had the following transactions. 1. Sold land (cost $12,000) for $15,000. 2. Issued common stock at par f
    7·1 answer
  • One disadvantage of a partnership is lower monitoring costs. limited liability. difficulty raising funds. it permits greater spe
    10·1 answer
  • A corporation is:_________
    14·2 answers
  • A budget is prepared as part of a(n) _____ plan.
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!