1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stells [14]
3 years ago
14

Sara can take no more than 22 pounds of luggage on a trip. Her suitcase weighs 112 ounces, How many more pounds can she pack wit

hout going over the limit?
Show me your work please. :) <3
Mathematics
1 answer:
postnew [5]3 years ago
3 0
OK so 1 pound=16 ounces
so 112 divided by 16 is 7
22-7= 15
may be wrong with calculation I did mental math but there is the work just check answers
You might be interested in
What does mx+b stand for
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

thats the equation for slope-intercept form

Step-by-step explanation:

m is the slope and b is where the line intercepts on the y axis

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Scores of an IQ test have a​ bell-shaped distribution with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 17. Use the empirical rule
Citrus2011 [14]

Answer:

(a) 95% of people has an IQ score between 66 and 134.

(b) 5% of people has an IQ score less than 66 or greater than 134.

(c) 2.5% of people has an IQ score greater than 134.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that Scores of an IQ test have a​ bell-shaped distribution with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 17.

Let X = <u><em>Scores of an IQ test </em></u>

So, X ~ Normal(\mu=100, \sigma^{2} = 17^{2})

Now, the Empirical rule states that;

  • 68% of the data values lies within one standard deviation of the means.
  • 95% of the data values lies within two standard deviation of the means.
  • 99.7% of the data values lies within three standard deviation of the means.

That is;    [\mu-\sigma,\mu+\sigma]  =  [ 100-17,100+17 ]

                                      =  [83,117]

            [\mu-2\sigma,\mu+2\sigma]  =  [ 100-34,100+34 ]

                                       =  [66,134]

             [\mu-3\sigma,\mu+3\sigma]  =  [ 100-51,100+51 ]

                                        =  [49,151]

(a) Percentage of people that has an IQ score between 66 and 134​ is given by = P(66 < X < 134)

As seen above this value lies in the second category which means that 95%  of people that has an IQ score between 66 and 134.

(b) Percentage of people that has an IQ score less than 66 or greater than 134​ is given by;

As we know that 95% of the data values lies within 66 and 134, so the percentage of people that has an IQ score less than 66 or greater than 134 is = 100% - 95% = 5%.

(c) Since it has been calculated above that 5% ​of people has an IQ score less than 66 or greater than 134​ which means half of these people will lie below score of 66 and half of these will lie above score of 134.

SO, percentage of people that has an IQ score greater than 134 = \frac{5\%}{2} = 2.5%

Hence, 2.5% of people has an IQ score greater than 134.

3 0
3 years ago
Assume {v1, . . . , vn} is a basis of a vector space V , and T : V ------&gt; W is an isomorphism where W is another vector spac
Degger [83]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To prove that w_1,\dots w_n form a basis for W, we must check that this set is a set of linearly independent vector and it generates the whole space W. We are given that T is an isomorphism. That is, T is injective and surjective. A linear transformation is injective if and only if it maps the zero of the domain vector space to the codomain's zero and that is the only vector that is mapped to 0. Also, a linear transformation is surjective if for every vector w in W there exists v in V such that T(v) =w

Recall that the set w_1,\dots w_n is linearly independent if and only if  the equation

\lambda_1w_1+\dots \lambda_n w_n=0 implies that

\lambda_1 = \cdots = \lambda_n.

Recall that w_i = T(v_i) for i=1,...,n. Consider T^{-1} to be the inverse transformation of T. Consider the equation

\lambda_1w_1+\dots \lambda_n w_n=0

If we apply T^{-1} to this equation, then, we get

T^{-1}(\lambda_1w_1+\dots \lambda_n w_n) =T^{-1}(0) = 0

Since T is linear, its inverse is also linear, hence

T^{-1}(\lambda_1w_1+\dots \lambda_n w_n) = \lambda_1T^{-1}(w_1)+\dots +  \lambda_nT^{-1}(w_n)=0

which is equivalent to the equation

\lambda_1v_1+\dots +  \lambda_nv_n =0

Since v_1,\dots,v_n are linearly independt, this implies that \lambda_1=\dots \lambda_n =0, so the set \{w_1, \dots, w_n\} is linearly independent.

Now, we will prove that this set generates W. To do so, let w be a vector in W. We must prove that there exist a_1, \dots a_n such that

w = a_1w_1+\dots+a_nw_n

Since T is surjective, there exists a vector v in V such that T(v) = w. Since v_1,\dots, v_n is a basis of v, there exist a_1,\dots a_n, such that

a_1v_1+\dots a_nv_n=v

Then, applying T on both sides, we have that

T(a_1v_1+\dots a_nv_n)=a_1T(v_1)+\dots a_n T(v_n) = a_1w_1+\dots a_n w_n= T(v) =w

which proves that w_1,\dots w_n generate the whole space W. Hence, the set \{w_1, \dots, w_n\} is a basis of W.

Consider the linear transformation T:\mathbb{R}^2\to \mathbb{R}^2, given by T(x,y) = T(x,0). This transformations fails to be injective, since T(1,2) = T(1,3) = (1,0). Consider the base of \mathbb{R}^2 given by (1,0), (0,1). We have that T(1,0) = (1,0), T(0,1) = (0,0). This set is not linearly independent, and hence cannot be a base of \mathbb{R}^2

8 0
3 years ago
In which direction does the graph of the function shown below open?
sp2606 [1]

Answer:

D. Up

Step-by-step explanation:

When a parabola has the form  y=ax^2+bx+c , It is vertical (opens up or down).

Because the variable "x" is squared.

If  "a" is positive, then the parabola opens up, but if it is negative, then the parabola opens down.

In this case you have the quadratic function:

f(x) = 2x^2+5x-4

Which can be rewritten as:

 y = 2x^2+5x-4

Therefore, it is vertical, because it has the form:  y=ax^2+bx+c

You can observe that the value of "a" is:

a=2

Then, since "a" is positive, the parabola opens up.

5 0
3 years ago
Use scientific notation to find the product of 20.5 × 10 7 and 0.000036. 73.8 × 10 2
earnstyle [38]
Well its an difficult because I need to get more <em>information</em>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Simplify 24x5 y6 . A) 2x2 y3 6x B) 4x2 y3 6x C) 6x2 y3 4x D) 6x2 y3 2x
    14·1 answer
  • A new soup recipe contains 33\%33%33, percent less sodium per serving than the old soup recipe. The old soup recipe contained xx
    14·2 answers
  • Just pick the right answer , that all u have to do. &lt;3
    5·2 answers
  • The difference of 4x and 3 is -6
    13·1 answer
  • X + x + 3 + x / 2 equals 23
    10·1 answer
  • What is 4,952 rounded to the nearest hundred
    6·1 answer
  • Is the following relation a function?<br><br> Yes <br> No
    8·1 answer
  • Solve for x in the diagram below.
    14·2 answers
  • A share is sold for the market value of ₹1000. Is the face value of share is ₹100 and brokerage is paid at the rate of 0.1%what
    8·1 answer
  • Suppose that AKL M is isosceles with base MK.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!