Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
Civil liberties are protections against government actions. For example, the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights guarantees citizens the right to practice whatever religion they please. Government, then, cannot interfere in an individual's freedom of worship.
Answer:
Peasants and nobles in the middle ages were very different from each other. Peasants lived a life of working hard to get things, while nobles were gave what they wanted. Peasants had to farm and work all day to get food for their families.
Explanation:
The zone of proximal development describes the difference between what young people can do on their own and what they can do with the assistance of more experienced people.
<h3>What is a zone of proximal development?</h3>
Lev Vygotsky's theory of learning and development included a crucial concept known as the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). A learner's zone of proximal development is the area between what they can do on their own and what they can do with adult supervision or in cooperation with more experienced peers.
<h3>What role does zone proximal development play?</h3>
The core tenet of the ZPD is that by helping a student complete a task that is just a little bit beyond their level of proficiency, a more experienced individual can improve the learner's learning. The expert gradually reduces their assistance as the pupil gains proficiency until they can complete the task on their own.
<h3>What is an example of a zone of proximal development?</h3>
Consider a learner who has recently learned fundamental addition. They may now be in their zone of proximal development, which denotes that they are capable of learning subtraction and are likely to be able to master it with support and direction.
learn more about zone of proximal development here <u>brainly.com/question/1433194</u>
#SPJ4
Answer:
they are things like the amendments given to us by federal law (think of the bill of rights we have them just because the constitution says so)
Explanation:
