It should be after "lives" and before "they." This is because it is a non-restrictive element. It also informing you on how the Richardsons' lives were changed.
The answer is shown above
Answer:
1) extremity
2) extreme
3) extract
4) extra
5) extinction
6) extend
Explanation:
<em>Alphabetical order is a system whereby character strings are placed in order based on the position of the characters in the conventional ordering of an </em><em>alphabet,</em><em> </em><em>so </em><em>basically </em><em>because </em><em>we </em><em>are </em><em>doing </em><em>reverse</em><em> </em><em>alp</em><em>h</em><em>abetical </em><em>order </em><em>we </em><em>are </em><em>doing </em><em>everything</em><em> </em><em>with </em><em>the </em><em>last </em><em>letters </em><em>in </em><em>the </em><em>alphabet</em><em> </em><em>first.</em>
Answer:
The word choice helps develop the poem because shes is explaining something if u closely listen she/ he is talking about a voice that is telling people about a life time and about love and everything else.She also describes voice and love in the story and other people's voices so that they can be herd because most people aren't herd and she wants people to be herd so that people know who and what there voices mean and what they are She says that those are the voices or 3 or 2 people who need to be herd sometimes.
Explanation:
Answer:
Extravagant hypothesis.
Explanation:
Fallacies represent the error/flaw in reasoning that spoils the validity of the argument. An extravagant hypothesis is a kind of fallacy that occurs when an exaggerated or unlikely explanation or comparison is provided unnecessarily where a simpler or less elaborate description could work more efficiently. <em>Similarly, this example proposes an extravagant comparison(with 'aliens') that represents a flaw in logical reasoning(comparison here) </em>that neglects the effectiveness of the intended meaning. Thus, it exemplifies the 'extravagant hypothesis' fallacy.