Question

which example most clearly uses parallelism to convey the idea that you cant take back words that have been spoken?

Answer 1

C. There's no way to undo the hurt, no way to erase what was said. There's no way to make someone forget.

Parallelism is the repetition of the same grammatical structure across a list, group of phrases, or group of sentences. In this answer, the parallel element is the repetition of "no way to" follow by a verb and direct object. This answer also address that idea that you can't take back words by saying that the words can't be undone, erased, or forgotten. Option A also uses a parallel structure, but it doesn't show that words can't be taken back. Option B is not in parallel structure. Option D begins with a parallel structure but it's not continued through to the last sentence.