I think that the central idea conveyed in the above excerpt is that the United States is willing to extend help to nations that are under communism. They are willing to extend help through financial aid and economic stability to ensure that the people under the beleaguered nations can also enjoy the freedom that citizens of the United States enjoy under a democratic government. However, the citizens of the United States must also be in agreement to the proposal of extending help to other nations.
Truman uses Logos and Pathos to persuade his audience to his way of thinking.
Logos refers to logic. Pathos refers to an appeal to emotions.
He uses the words "I believe..." to infer how passionate he is about his proposals. He also gives logical scenarios that supports his beliefs.
<span><span>The lines in the
excerpt from "L'Allegro" contrast with those ideas in </span>"Il
Penseroso," John Milton are:</span>
Married to immortal
verse
Such as the meeting soul
may pierce
In notes with many a
winding bout
Of linked sweetness long
drawn out
Answer:
Hi, there the answer is
1. They are octopus arms
2. Octopus eat clams and crabs
3. To push or to move forward in a particular direction
4. They change color and blend in so any animals can't eat them
The Octopus shoots out ink to help and hide from other animals that might try to eat it
Hope This Helps :)
Explanation:
"Angela's Ashes" is a controversial book and one that had an even more controversial repercussion helped him to shape people's intense reaction to this book.
This book recounts the memories of its author, McCourt, living in a backward region, with neglectful parents, precocious sexuality, hopelessness, death and poor quality of life. In addition, McCourt expresses depressing and derogatory thoughts within controversial memories and with a strong psychological content.
Because it is a book with strong and impactful themes, many people did not like the book because they believe that the author exaggerates and glamorizes the suffering and broken personal relationships. Other people, however, liked the book because it portrays a reality that many people go through and that the governments and people favored in society do not care.
Many events narrated in the book were denied by witnesses and people who lived with McCourt, which favored the negative reception that the book received. McCourt himself claims that he has modified some situations to make the narrative more fluid and engaging.
