Answer:
A. relatively more inelastic because water is a necessity
Explanation:
Inelastic goods refers to the type of goods which demand wouldn't move that much regardless of the price change.
This tends to be the case for every products that are considered as necessity.
If let's say the price of water is $1 per bottle. We all know that every human being need to drink at least 1.5 L of it to stay alive. If all producers of water decided to raise the price into $2 ,the customers would most likely still purchase it. They have no choice.
"race" without the quotation marks is your answer.
The overall verdict of the best method to use for teaching between asynchronous and synchronous teaching is:
- No clear winner, engage the students and make sure to answer any questions they might have.
<h3>What is Synchronous Teaching?</h3>
This refers to the type of learning where a person uses virtual means to learn, from a distance and attends class at a certain time.
An asynchronous teaching on the other hand is the type of learning where the student learn at their own pace and time.
With this in mind, there is no clear winner between the two as it is imperative to teach students in an engaging manner where they can ask questions, meet daily/weekly targets and understand concepts.
Read more about synchronous teaching here:
brainly.com/question/14591988
Undoubtedly, there needs to be a certain degree of arms proliferation in all countries in order to secure their borders from external or internal threats. However, when the military budget of countries like the USA, the world´s largest power, is far greater than the budget destined to meet other needs of the State, these latter ones are unavoidably neglected, to the detriment of the country´s people. On the other hand, if a greater budget is destined to the building of infrastructure, history shows —like in Japan and Germany— that the economy becomes less dependent on warfare and relies more on human capital and culture.
The question then becomes whether economic gain through arms proliferation is more advantageous to the welfare of the people or if the wellbeing of the people —through the building of infrastructure— is more beneficial to any given government. Since the wellbeing of the people is, in principle —based on the International Bill of Human Rights—, the aim of all countries, these should be more preoccupied with the building of infrastructure.
