Answer: i'm not 100% sure
8.)c
9.)d
Explanation:
The correct answer would be option D
Answer: D. None of the above
Explanation:
In the above case in the question, Kimberly has done nothing wrong. What was done was simply followed the principle of demand.
In this case, she saw that she was the first cinema to show the movie and seek to maximize profit. Some there'll be an increase in demand for the movie, thus can being about an increase in price which is what happened in this case.
Therefore, what she did is not illegal, and unfair. Therefore, the best option is D.
Answer:
30 miles per hour (mph)
According to the Supreme Court of the United States, the duration of the delay, the causes of the delay, the appellant's assertion of the right to a prompt review and appeal, and prejudice are the four (4) criteria that should be taken into consideration by the courts.
<h3>What was the decision of the Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo?</h3>
Held: The defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial cannot be established by any rigid criteria; rather, it can only be evaluated on an as-needed basis by weighing the prosecution's and the defendant's actions.
<h3>What does Barker v. Wingo 1972 signify?</h3>
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, specifically the right of defendants, was the subject of the United States Supreme Court case Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972).
To know more about U.S. Supreme Court visit:-
brainly.com/question/224703
#SPJ4