Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
![We\ are\ given:\\TU=SQ\\TP=PQ\\\angle TPU= \angle SPQ [Vertically\ Opposite\ Angles\ Are\ Equal]\\Hence,\\As\ we\ are\ given,\ 2\ sides\ and\ 1\ angle\ of\ each\ triangle\ correspond,\ we\\ could\ use\ the\ SAS\ Congruency Rule.\\But:\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=We%5C%20are%5C%20given%3A%5C%5CTU%3DSQ%5C%5CTP%3DPQ%5C%5C%5Cangle%20TPU%3D%20%5Cangle%20SPQ%20%5BVertically%5C%20Opposite%5C%20Angles%5C%20Are%5C%20Equal%5D%5C%5CHence%2C%5C%5CAs%5C%20we%5C%20are%5C%20given%2C%5C%202%5C%20sides%5C%20and%5C%201%5C%20angle%5C%20of%5C%20each%5C%20triangle%5C%20correspond%2C%5C%20we%5C%5C%20could%5C%20use%5C%20the%5C%20SAS%5C%20Congruency%20Rule.%5C%5CBut%3A%5C%5C)
<em>As SAS Congruency Rule tells us that 'Two triangles are congruent only if two sides and an included angle of one triangle corresponds to two sides and an included angle of the other' .</em>
<em>Here,</em>
<em>As ∠TPU and ∠SPQ are NOT the included angle of ΔTUP and ΔSPQ respectively, the two triangles cannot be proven congruent through SAS Congruency.</em>
<em>Note: We also cannot apply SSA congruency as SSA congruency doesnt exist.</em>
1. A rational number is a number that can be written as a fraction.
For example: 1/3, 5/7, 90/666, etc
Note: Any integer can be written as a fraction.
Look:
5 = 5/1 = rational
-14 = -14/1 = rational
2. There is no difference between a rational and integer.
Answer:
x > 7
Step-by-step explanation:
you move over the 10 to the left and it becomes negative.
x > 17 - 10
so then you subtract the 17 - 10 and you would get 7.
x > 7
3.5 - 3.2 = 3.8 - 3.5 = 4.1 - 3.8 = 0.3 (common difference)