The council house fight resulted in an increased hostility towards whites by the Comanches.
Explanation:
The Comanches were nomads , while the Texans were settlers.When the Texans moved into the Comanches territory,the Comanches were not very happy with it and started raiding and stealing Texans horses, cattle and children.
But later the Comanches wanted peace , so they called for a negotiation talk with the Texans. The Texans demanded the Comanches bring all the white prisoners in good faith.
However, when the Comanches came on the day of the council house of fight,they came with only one prisoner,This angered the Texans and it lead to a fight between the two leading to a massacre of both the parties.
In the end only on one Comanche chief along with some women and children survived.So this lead to further animosity between the Comanches and the Texans.
Answer:
to convince the public that people in poverty need help
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that this passage would have been used in order to convince the public that people in poverty need help
. This is an excerpt from by Jacob A. Riis, 1890, and Riis spent his entire life trying to expose the unfortunate circumstances of urban areas in order to force the government to intervene.
Answer:
C. whether the audience thinks information is being shared in an appropriate way
Explanation:
A persuasive message is a type of message that seeks, to sways, informs, convinces, or calls to action of the message recipient(s). Persuasive messages are often modeled in terms of reason versus emotion.
Hence, whether a one- or two-sided message is more persuasive will depends on all of the following:
1. whether the audience already agrees with the message: the moment audience or recipients agrees with the message, that means the message is persuasive.
2. whether the audience is unaware of opposing arguments: often times, the momement, the audience find a message persuasive, they are not aware of the opposing argument, thus believe the message being passed to them is the final.
3. whether the audience is unlikely later to consider the opposition: this implies that, when the audience is unlikely to consider the message of the opposition, the message being passed to them has persuaded them fully.
However, whether the audience thinks information is being shared in an appropriate way is not enough to ascertain that, the message whether one sided or two sided is persuasive.
Your answer might be b i am make a good guess here
