In sociologist daniel rossides's model of the class system of the U.S. the social class that contains the smallest portion of the population is the upper class.
Daniel Rossides was a prominent sociologist who in his book The American Class System : An Introduction to the Social Stratification talks about the model of the class system in detail.
In the model of the class system, he describes the human society using five class model. In his book he uses Weberian idea of class prestige and power.
He claims that a person's position in a social system reflects some combination of their class status and power.
To learn more about class here
brainly.com/question/28212543
#SPJ4
The person you are exchanging with isn't your enemy
The statement is true that the models of urban growth fail to account for the ancient and medieval cities, many European cities, cities in the least industrialized nations and urban planning. The primary models are concentric zone, sector, multiple-nuclei, and peripheral.
The answer is letter A.
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
Answer:
this drug is definitley a game changer for everybody and needs to put out there for everybody
Explanation:
because its a cancer fighting drug... that probably has a huge street worth so i could sell some 12 year olds these... hope this helped
