Answer:
Ans 1)
As Average Annual return increases from Combination A to E we can observe that Standard deviation also increases from A to E
Therefore it is clear that there is positive relationship between the Risk of Caroline's portfolio and the average annual return.
Ans 2)
IF Caroline needs to reduce the risk associated with portfolio combination D from 15 to 5 then he can do 2 things such that he should sell some portion of portfolio invested into stocks and ultimately accept lower returns because as we see in Part 1) answer risk and returns are positively correlated.
Option 2) and Option 3) are correct
Ans 3)
95% confidence interval gives us range of -2*SD, 2*SD
therefore range of return for given scenario with portfolio return equals to 3.5% and SD=5%
(Mean- z value*SD , Mean value*SD)=
(3.5%-2*5% , 3.5%+2*5%)=(-6.5%,13.5%)
Gain of 13.5% and Loss of -6.5%
Answer:
b. $88,204
Explanation:
The computation of the carrying value of the note payable is shown below:
= Present value of the notes + interest
= $120,000 × 0.680583 + ($120,000 × 0.680583 × 8%)
= $81,670 + $6,534
= $88,204
hence, the second option is correct
hypothetical economy in which households spend 0.5 of each additional dollar they earn and save the remaining 0.5
<h3>What is
hypothetical economy?</h3>
The paper investigates the consequences for a hypothetical economy of a set of government tax and spending policies that are unsustainable in the long run and are recognized as such by private individuals.
Comparative Economic Systems is a sub-category of economics that deals with the comparative study of various economic organization systems such as capitalism, socialism, feudalism, and the mixed economy.
The marginal propensity to consume is calculated by dividing the change in consumption by the change in income.
Each economy operates under its own set of conditions and assumptions. Traditional economies, command economies, mixed economies, and market economies are the four major types of economic systems.
To know more about hypothetical economy follow the link:
brainly.com/question/27893144
#SPJ4
Answer:
Has failed his fiduciary duties and is responsible for any losses in value the owner has suffered.
Explanation:
In the above case, the manager has failed to maintain the units in proper working order and the property declines in value which is of a negative effect to the property owner.
In this case, the tenant has the option of hiring an outside party to make the necessary repairs. The tenant should do that in good faith and should be reasonable in choosing who to make the repairs. This cost will probably be deducted from their next rent check.
Also, if the problem violates state or local building or health codes, a tenant may decide to contact the local authorities regarding the issue. If inspectors come out and find the problem, the landlord may face an order to fix the problem, plus possible fines and/or penalties.
