1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
n200080 [17]
3 years ago
12

What happened in American public schools because of the decision in Brown v. Board of Education? A. All southern schools became

private so they would not have to integrate. B. School systems across the country quickly integrated. C. Integration took place in some school districts but was slow to happen in others. D. No schools integrated. The nation waited for the case to be appealed.
History
2 answers:
Nat2105 [25]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is C. After the decision in Brown v. Board of Education, integration took place in some school districts but was slow to happen in others.

The immediate outcome of this decision was the end of de jure racial segregation in American public education institutions (although in fact it continued for several more years in several Southern localities), when it was determined by the judges that the "Equal Protection Clause" of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution was being violated.

Yet many politicians and jurists (especially in the south) did not interpret the decision as "final" and resisted, especially since the Court did not specify the method or deadline for desegregation. A second deliberation (Brown II) was required to order that desegregation in public places (such as schools) be done more quickly and effectively.

rosijanka [135]3 years ago
4 0
B, school systems across the country quickly integrates
You might be interested in
Which of the following BEST summarizes the overall disagreement between the federalist and anti-federalists?
ivolga24 [154]

You didn't provide us with choices, so I'll simply provide some historical explanation.  The main issue was whether the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights added.

The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states.  Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA.  They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.

Federalists believed the Constitution itself clearly limited government power and protected the rights of the people.  Nevertheless, the addition of a Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided  reassurance to Anti-Federalists in the fight over ratification.  The compromise which led to agreement in regard to ratification of the Constitution was called the Massachusetts Compromise, because of major opposition to ratification that had existed in Massachusetts.  John Hancock and Samuel Adams (both of them anti-Federalists) were the ones who helped negotiate the compromise. The anti-Federalists agreed that they would support ratification of the Constitution, with the understanding that recommendations for amendments would follow if the Constitution was ratified.  The Federalists promised to support the proposed amendments, which would outline a Bill of Rights to guarantee protection of specific rights the anti-Federalists wanted specifically asserted in the Constitution.  

The US Constitution was ratified in 1788.  The Bill of Rights was created in 1789 and ratified in 1791.

4 0
3 years ago
What were some factors that led to the end of Africa's vast wealth?
Charra [1.4K]
Mining of fossil fuels and important minerals
6 0
3 years ago
How did Islamic scholars contribute to the preservation of classical knowledge?
Leto [7]

Answer:

Preservation

Explanation:

They preserved much classical text(Not their own but Roman and Greek). They introduced the Arabic number system

3 0
2 years ago
What is the difference between hieroglyphics and cuneiform?
Wittaler [7]

Answer:

hieroglyphic  is a consonant-centered abjad, the cuneiform script is a syllabaic, logographic script

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where was Constatinople located?
miskamm [114]

Constantinople is an ancient city in modern-day Turkey that's now known as Istanbul. First settled in the seventh century B.C., Constantinople developed into a thriving port thanks to its prime geographic location between Europe and Asia and its natural harbor.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What long-lasting effect did the Aryans have on India?
    5·2 answers
  • The War Powers Resolution of 1973 made the president notify congress within 48 hours of deploying military force and... The pres
    14·1 answer
  • With which statement about the yuan Dynasty when Marco Polo have agreed
    6·1 answer
  • During the Clinton presidency, terrorists bombed which one of the following? Sears Building World Trade Center Prudential Buildi
    5·2 answers
  • The Spanish must have been surprised to learn that the Inca Empire ran very efficiently without three inventions considered esse
    9·1 answer
  • Which quotation sums up Herbert Hoover's view of the Great Depression in 1933?
    12·2 answers
  • John Locke developed empiricism, which is based on______________.
    5·1 answer
  • Write a caption of 20 to 50 words for the following image.
    12·2 answers
  • What is the great building that solomon makes? Who is the architect?
    14·1 answer
  • “[The Native Americans] are so ingenuous and free with all they have, that no one would believe it who has not seen it; of anyth
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!