Answer:
Explanation:
According to the law of demand,a rise in price leads to a decrease in quantity demanded and a fall in price leads to an increase in quantity demanded.
1.The price of a gallon of 2% milk has risen, therefore, quantity demanded decreases.
2.The price of laser tag has fallen,therefore,quantity demanded increases.
3.The price of dressers and desks has risen,therefore,quantity demanded decreases.
4.The price of pork shoulder has fallen from $3.99 per pound to $1.99 per pound,therefore,quantity demanded increases.
5.Another MP3 album comes free,with purchase of an MP3 album .This means the supplier have effectively halved the price.therefore,quantity demanded increases.
Answer:
1.Parties [Identify the plaintiff and the defendant] - The plaintiff is Henry Keller of H.K.Enterprises and the defendant is Bank of Nigeria and Nigerian individuals Central Bank of Nigeria, Paul Ogwuma, ?Alhaji Rasheed, Alhaji M.A. Sadiq.
2.Facts [Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case] - The case was filed by Keller against the defendants in United States. The case was filed under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) as the plaintiff found himself a victim of fraud and financial scam.The scam occured when one of the defendants approached the plaintiff who was the sales representative of medical equipments for granting him the distribution rights for Nigeria. The expected amount of money was not transferred in the account of plaintiff inspite of his attempts of meeting the requirements of the defendants. The defendants acted on the behalf of Central Bank of Nigeria and as Nigerian individuals.
3.Procedure [Who brought the appeal? What was the outcome in the lower court(s)?] - The appeal was filed by the defendants Central Bank of Nigeria,?Paul Ogwuma, Alhaji Rasheed, Alhaji M.A. Sadiq. The lower court gave the decision that the claims of fraud and misrepresentation do not hold against the defendants as the plaintiff entered into an arrangement with them which is not legal and as per the rules. However the lower court ruled that immunity cannot be given under FSIA to the defendants as the commercial activity is an exception and claims for violation of RICO are applicable on them.
4. Issue [Note the central question or questions on which the case turns] - The case turns on the appeal of defendants to be granted immunity under Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. The ruling indicated that the defendants have sovereign authority. Also, the commercial activity clause did not apply in this case as the activity was not done in United States and did not meet the legal standards of a commercial activity.
5.Explain the applicable law(s). - Applicable laws are Common law fraud, violations of RICO(Rackteer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act), Misrepresentation.
6.Holding [How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?] - The court resolved the issue by giving a decision in the favor of defendants by ruling that immunity is given to Foreign nationals under FSIA and dismissed any claims filed against them under RICO.
7.Reasoning [Explain the logic that supported the court's decision] - The logic supporting the court's decision is that the arrangement between the plaintiff and defendants including the signed contract was not as per the laws and rules and was not legally compliant. Moreover the commercial activity was out of bounds for United states so the exception to FISA is not applicable. The defendants claimed that they did not enter into the contract with the plaintiff.
Explanation:
Answer: Are you bored because i am
.
Answer: Publicity
Explanation: Publicity is any product, service or company's public exposure or recognition. It can also refer to the transfer of information to the general public from its source, often but not always through the press.
Advertising subjects include individuals of interest of the public, products and services, art or entertainment organizations and works. Advertising is one aspect of promotion and marketing from a marketing perspective.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that Kitson is benefiting from publicity.
Answer:
B. as they will have the same common business activity to their competitors
Explanation:
Gross Profit Margin = (Revenue – Cost of Goods Sold) / Revenue*100%
Net Profit Margin = PAT / Revenue * 100%
The EBITDA is calculated by adding back interest expense, taxes, depreciation & amortization expense to net profit or PAT. Then, the EBITDA margin is calculated by dividing the EBITDA by the sales revenue and is expressed in terms of percentage.
