<span>x 2 3 4
f(x) 5.5 7 8.5 </span>
The first function is linear. When you subtract 5.5 from 7, you get 1.5 and when you subtract 7 from 8.5 you also get 1.5. That's how we know it's a linear function because there's clearly pattern. HOWEVER, if you had 5.5, 7, and 9 that would not be a linear function. Why? Because when you take away 7 from 9 you get 2. In order for it to be a linear function you have to get the same exact number when you subtract.
<span>x 0 3 6
f(x) 1 8 64</span>
The second function is exponential because when you divide you get the exact same number. 8/1 = 8 and 64/8 = 8. So this is exponential. But if you had 72 instead of 64 it would not be an exponential function because there has to be a pattern.
I hope this makes sense. Btw I had this question on my test too and this is correct.
<u>Testing the hypothesis</u>, it is found that since the <u>p-value of the test is 0.0042 < 0.01</u>, it can be concluded that the proportion of subjects who respond in favor is different of 0.5.
At the null hypothesis, it is tested if the <u>proportion is of 0.5</u>, that is:
At the alternative hypothesis, it is tested if the <u>proportion is different of 0.5</u>, that is:
The test statistic is given by:
In which:
is the sample proportion.- p is the value tested at the null hypothesis.
- n is the sample size.
In this problem, the parameters are given by:
The value of the test statistic is:
Since we have a <u>two-tailed test</u>(test if the proportion is different of a value), the p-value of the test is P(|z| > 2.86), which is 2 multiplied by the p-value of z = -2.86.
Looking at the z-table, z = -2.86 has a p-value of 0.0021.
2(0.0021) = 0.0042
Since the <u>p-value of the test is 0.0042 < 0.01</u>, it can be concluded that the proportion of subjects who respond in favor is different of 0.5.
A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/24330815
Answer:
You can group a ratio or a multiple of x or y to prove a linear function.
To set coordinates randomly pick a title ie) rise in price for matches over 40 years.
$14 yr 10 $20 yr 11 etc. $25 year 12 etc.
We show yr 0 = 0 yr 1 = 8 and if 8 is the price we have a ratio start of 1:8 upon year 1. we then pinpoint the data what year was $16 and we know that yr 10 = $14 so yr 11 = $16.
Once we can write a format which isn't asked we can prove the relationship target of the graph would be x8
As the x y relationship coordinates can be shown here.
= 1 , 8
2 ,16
3 ,24
4, 32
and then change number of years to decades. To make a linear equation work we could change the rate upon the decade that shows a more stable rate of change to be of significance and easier to read.
Step-by-step explanation:
A linear function is a type of function of x and y proves a single line.
When a given ratio or rate of increase occurs ie) xy = 1/8 or 8/1 we can set the 1-4 decades spaced out on a graph and go up by decades since 1980 = decade 1, decade 2 decade 3 decade 4
for x value and for y we have price the actual data of change.
Therefore y = price change from $8 - $32 in last 40 years to appeal to advertisers who want to be ethical and fair for customers who pay more than $32 a game, they look for linear graphs that can show least amount cost of a ticket and average price ticket and compare success stories in advertising to crowds to further testing graphs before advertising so that companies can test advertising before sponsorship which is one way of investment, that can help ease costs of selection of tickets and go full circle for the financier of such games.They need linear graphs to compare to other business as each linear graphs can show better stability. So it is a good example to show costs and prices as prices demonstrate exactly how companies grow compared to their competitors.
Answer:
#2: y-intercept=-2
Bottom left graph: Slope:4/2
y-intercept:-2
Equation: y=4/2x-2
Bottom right graph: Slope:-2
y-intercept:8
Equation: y=-2x+8
