Answer:
Interrater reliability between the two data collectors was high
Step-by-step explanation:
Explanation-
- Interrater reliability is the consistency of observations between two or more observers.
- An Agreement of 54 out of 56 scores would indicate a high level of interrater reliability.
- The data collection method was appropriate for pressure ulcer risk assessment.
- The risk assessments did not have to be done by both evaluators at the same time.
The answer should be 6 I.e 6^1 as with indices rules you need to subtract the powers (-3-(-4)) which equals 1
She bought 4 brushes at $3 each
And 8 tubes of paint at $ .50 each
3x4=12
.50x8=4
12+4=16
Compute successive differences of the terms.
If they are all the same, the sequence is arithmetic and the common difference is the difference you have found.
If successive pairs of differences have the same ratio, the sequence is geometric and the common ratio is the ratio you have determined.
Example of arithmetic sequence:
1, 3, 5, 7
Successive differences are 3-1 = 2, 5-3 = 2, 7-5 = 2. All the differences are 2, which is the common difference of the sequence.
Example of geometric sequence:
1, -3, 9, -27
Successive differences are -3-1 = -4, 9-(-3) = 12, -27-9 = -36. These are not the same, so the sequence is not arithmetic. Ratios of successive pairs of differences are 12/-4 = -3, -36/12 = -3. These are the same, so the sequence is geometric with common ratio -3.
Multiply (x/6) by 6 to get common denominators and then you can simplify equation to 6x=15, divide each side by 6 answer is x=2.5 or 5/2