Answer: None of the above
Explanation:
All of the above are correct.
For option A, Economists who advocate discretionary monetary policy do indeed believe that the monetary authority using this policy is more flexible to shape the best monetary policy to the existing circumstances.
Option B is also correct because Crowding out occurs when the government increases investment by borrowing which leaves less money for the private sector to borrow so they spend less. The government spent money here yet the private sector did not spend less so it is Zero Crowing out.
Option C by option B's explanation holds true because the entire amount the Government increased by was denied the private sector.
Option D is also true as not all Economists prefer rule-based monetary policy to discretionary monetary policy.
They are all true.
Answer:
NPV = -$132,193.77
Explanation:
best case NPV:
price per unit (+4%) = $48.88
sales per year (+4%) = 32,240
variable cost per unit (-2%) = $22.54
fixed costs (-2%) = $826,042
depreciation expense per year = $227,000 / 4 = $56,750
contribution margin per unit = $26.34
23% tax rate
discount rate = 11.5%
initial outlay = $227,000
net cash flows = {[($26.34 x 32,240) - $826,042 - $56,750] x 77%} + $56,750 = $30,885.392
NPV = -$132,193.77
Answer:
total expected bonus = $1262800
Explanation:
given data
bonus = $23,000
Probability = 12 percent
bonus = $10,000
Probability = 25 percent
bonus = $6,000
Probability = 8 percent
total sales = 220
solution
first we get probability for bonus amount = $0
probability = 1 - ( 12% + 25% + 8 % )
probability = 0.55
so here Expected bonus per employee company will pay is
Expected bonus = $23000 × (0.12) + $10000 × (0.25) + $6000 × (0.08) + $0 (0.55)
Expected bonus = $5740
so total expected bonus is
total expected bonus = $5740 × 220
total expected bonus = $1262800
I think it is C average total cost is minimized
