Answer:
As researchers knew that it is a faulty event the memory was of an impossible event.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
<em>16% of the whole group of students</em> were able to recall meeting a <em>Bugs bunny character</em>. It was an impossible event as such a large number of <em>students had not visited Disneyland</em>. The <em>fake memory was implanted via an advertisement where the people watching</em> it <em>felt that they had visited the place and shook hands with Bugs Bunny</em>. It was a false memory spread through the medium of advertisement.
Answer:
b.a computerized tomography (CT) scan.
Explanation:
The best technique to get an accurate image of the brain is a computerized tomography (CT) scan. This is a medical imagine technique where by different x-ray image of the brain taken from different angles are combined together with the aid of computer processing to give a clear picture of that section of the brain.
I think the it is B hope that helps
Where the question is there one
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
