Answer:
TRUE The Statement is correct
Explanation:
We need to add up both advertizement contract to knwo the total acquisition cost of the advertizement.
<u>First contract cost:</u>
365 daysper year / 7 dayts per week = 52 week per year
52 week per year x $20 dolllar per weke = $1,040
<u>Second contract cost:</u>
12 months per year x $100 per month = $1,200
Total acquisition cost: 2,240
Answer:
Option D.
Explanation:
Given information:
Formula for price elasticity of demand is
Substitute the given values in the above formula.
Absolute value is
The absolute value of the price elasticity of demand for DVD players is 2.67.
Therefore, the correct option is D.
Answer:
No, Jim is not correct.
Explanation:
Betty will win this case.
Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.
Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.
Therefore, Jim is not correct.
Answer:
$18.3 million
Explanation:
Financing activities: It includes those activities which comes under the long term liabilities and shareholder equity balance. The issue of shares is an inflow of cash whereas redemption, dividend, and the purchase of treasury stock is an outflow of cash.
The computation of the amount reported as a net cash flows from financing activities is shown below:
Cash flow from Financing activities
Issuance of common stock $38.6 million
Less: Purchase of treasury stock -$20.3 million
Net Cash flow from Financing activities $18.3 million
The overhead cost that should be allocated to Zeta via activity-based costing is $356,000.
The following formula for determining the overhead cost allocated to Zeta:
= Zeta pool no 1 ÷ total pool no 1 × pool cost + zeta pool no 2 ÷ total pool no 2 × pool cost + zeta pool no 3 ÷ total pool no 3 × pool cost
= 2,800 ÷ 4,000 × $160,000 + 55 ÷ 100 × $280,000 + 750 ÷ 3,000 x $360,000
= $356,000
Therefore we can conclude that the overhead cost that should be allocated to Zeta via activity-based costing is $356,000.
Learn more about the overhead here: brainly.com/question/11950737
