Answer:
true
Explanation:
things that can't be tolerated is harsh dissonances
Answer:
As per Kristy Johnson's letter where she mentioned the clauses of the acceptance of offer, she clearly mentioned that she will consider a response only if it is in written form and is sent through US mail.
Now Judy did as per the clauses and sent her a written acceptance through US mail whereas Michael telephoned her and let her know of her acceptance. If Kristy is adamant on her terms that she clearly mentioned in her letter to both and will stick to her word, then technically, it is Judy's fair right on the Montana interests whereas Michaels telephone call will be discarded as it did not fulfill the terms.
Italy is the modern country
Have a nice day! :)
Answer:
The description including its situation is discussed throughout the clarification section following.
Explanation:
- An individual's morality comes whenever he is sincere as well as committed to his profession but instead community, that whenever an individual decides to return his understanding to community and therefore to contribute his awareness for this with the greater good of humanity. Morality can always be demonstrated by the activities accomplished in professional competence a few days ago although by the relationship of the individual towards his subordinates as well as juniors.
- However, for the individual to become more honorable, the person should be doing his job and hopefully his highest quality to do something without cheating as well as appropriate. He should wish to reduce unpleasant thoughts, emotions, individuals, and communicate his understanding with those around, so that someone else can understand the good and evil throughout a community.
Whenever an individual makes meaningful contributions and works genuinely for his profession, people would probably respect himself and their function properly.
