The type of channel that speaker one and speaker two use in their communication would be auditory - b.
The fact that we're talking about "speaker" 1 and "speaker" 2 implies already the fact that both of them are talking and this then implies that they are using the auditory channel of communication.
Answer:
The correct answer is - It tends to cause subjects to behave differently than they would without the pretest.
Explanation:
In psychology, a pretest is an assessment for measuring or finding the characteristics of the participant or subject before introducing the treatment or intervention in the research or study. It is designed to have an idea about the behavior or knowledge of the subject.
The major risk of the pretest is that it leads to subjects acting or behaving differently than they would act without this pretest. This leads to errors in research as they can manipulate the study.
An
Antes de festejava para que los demonios salgan de el infierno,
Explanation:pero ahora los niños se disfrazan de ellos y salen a pedir dulces
Answer:
I would say that the best answer to the statement: The tests the trainer gave were intended to measure more than just recall of facts about the book, would be: False.
Explanation:
The example that we are shown here comes from situations that are given in a test that is known as the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Test, and they are intended to measure the capability that a person has to reason, and think critically.
In this case, we would say that the statement is false regarding the case in question, because the trainer issues the tests not to measure either the recall, or the abilities and concepts that the students acquired from the book, but she actually wanted to see if the video format of teaching was actually more efficient than the actual book. Given that this was her intention, to measure the video vs. the book, in achieving her final goal, which was acquirement of skills and concepts on Time Management, her test must have been geared towards that end, and not to simply measure the book´s impact. It was a bonus that afterwards she found that those students who were exposed to the video later on decided to read the book. Given the information on the case itself, we can reason that the answer is false.
