Answer:
Here are the main points for an informative speech about the history of the @ symbol.
I. The first recorded use of the @ symbol was in 1536 to represent units of wine.
II. In later centuries, the @ symbol was used to mean "at the rate of" or "at the cost of."
III. Today’s @ symbol came into use in 1971 in the first e-mail ever sent.
These main points are arranged in <em><u>chronological</u></em> order.
Explanation:
Chronology is one of the auxiliary sciences of history. Its purpose is to determine the temporal order of historical events. Events happen in a place and at a specific time. Space and time are two coordinates that allow us to understand reality. A chronological order is an order established based on a temporal sequence. The expression is often used to account for real historical events or fictional narratives where events are presented in a virtual temporal order.
It is important to distinguish the <em>chronological order</em> from a <em>temporal succession</em>. Both are closely linked but differ in fundamental circumstances. Indeed, temporal succession is the order that events have over time. In a different way, the chronological order usually refers to the way in which real events are enunciated. Indeed, the chronological order is a type of circumstance related to discourse, and therefore, to communication.
They were given a pardon.
As a candidate, Carter himself had said he advocated "pardon" -- a term he preferred over "amnesty." He said, "Amnesty means that what you did was right. Pardon means that
what you did, whether it's right or wrong, you are forgiven
for it. And I do advocate a pardon for draft evaders. ... Now is the time to heal our country after the Vietnam war. ... I hope to bring about an end to the divisiveness that has occurred in our country as a result of the Vietnam war."
On his second day in office, President Carter in fact did pardon draft dodgers. This applied only to civilians who evaded the draft. It did not apply to active duty military personnel who went absent without leave (AWOL) or deserted their units during the war.
Plessy was a citizen who claimed to be seventh eights Caucasian and only one eighth Black. He was imprisoned and trial in a criminal court after an incident that took place while in New Orleans, in 1896, when he tried to board a car designated for hite people. He was denied a seat in the car for white people and urged to take a seat in the car for black people. As Plessy refused on the basis of his predominantly Caucasian race, the train staff arrested him, and then he was put in the parish jail. He was charged with criminal counts, but Plessy requested his case to be presented to the Supreme Court for he deemed there had been violations of the Thirteen and Fourteenth Amendments (abolition of slavery and equal treatment).
The Supreme Court's opinion stated that the treatment based on "equal but separated" did not conflict with the Thirteenth Amendment, for this amendment only protected citizens from being enslaved or forced to involuntary servitude, and no conflict was found with the Fourteenth Amendment since it enforced equality, but it did not specify under which terms. Therefore, the decision of the Supreme Court supported the doctrine "equal but separate" and segregation as well.
<span>to build military strength to deter aggression</span>
