Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
The correct answer is b. Adjusting revenues to only include organic revenue growth.
Explanation:
One of the quantitative planning techniques is the projection of financial statements or also called pro forma statements.
The applications that can be had among others are the following:
Know how the year will end for tax purposes in terms of income and deductions in order to make decisions before the end of the year.
Another application will be to know the external financing needs for the period you want to know.
The most common and practical method of projecting financial statements is based on sales.
Answer:
Cost of goods sold is $196
Explanation:
Using FIFO inventory sold are valued at the price of the most earliest stock in inventory.
The 16 units would be valued at $11 per one while the remaining 2 units would be valued at price of the purchase made on August 3 which cost $10 each
costs of goods sold=($11*16)+($10*2)
=$176+$20=$196
The costs of goods sold would be $196 if FIFO method of inventory valuation is used
Answer:
Annual synergy gain = $ 178,500
Explanation:
Value of synergy gain from acquisition = 18 - 15.9 = 2.1 million
Annual synergy gain = 2.1 *.085 = .1785 million or $ 178,500
Annual synergy gain = $ 178,500
Answer: d. survey data from the local community.
Explanation:
In deciding the case the Judge there are methods to use such as cases from other jurisdictions ( as this is a case of first impression), the values of their society and its customs, as well as Public policy.
One thing that should not be used in survey data from the local community. People will always have opinions on a matter of law and a lot of the time this is based on what they feel not what is legal. This is why juries do not just and sentences down immediately, they wait until they have been presented with legal arguments so they may be wiser legally.
Survey data has a very high chance of being devoid of this knowledge and also will be biased. It is best the Judge avoids such.