Answer:
Example of not a natural experiment an economist might use to evaluate a theory is:
C. Here the Students in a microeconomics principles course are advised to play a game with their classmates to determine and evaluate what all decisions they make under certain adjusted circumstances.
Explanation:
Natural experiment : A natural experiment is referred to an observational and also an empirical study in which we get to study about the experimental and controllable varieties of variables. which can not het manipulated anywhere by the researchers.
Instead these experiments are allowed to affect the environment and the nature or the different factors which are not under control of our researchers. In contrast to the experimental values and all the natural experiments are even not controlled by the researchers but instead they also admire and obseve those experiments for their own studies.
So, the right option is:
C. Here the Students in a microeconomics principles course are advised to play a game with their classmates to determine and evaluate what all decisions they make under certain adjusted circumstances.
The main problem with this team seems to be centered around differences in the formality of structure.
Cross-functional Work Team
This type of work team happens when individuals or groups of different functions come together to work together towards a common goal. This can either be done by two or more team leads to take the initiative or if there is a certain company project where employees of specific skills are required from different departments to do the job.
Problems with Cross-functional Team
There are certain problems faced when working in cross-functional teams. One of which is time management, where the team must meet up to manage the project and to discuss its further development. In the given question "time orientation" this certainly is not the main problem.
Another important factor is that employee success is based on goals and objectives. In doing so, the individual becomes more focused on their personal goals and loses sight of what is more important to prioritize, which is the company as a whole. Of course, this means that neither the interpersonal nor the goal orientation is the main problem arising between the team.
Finally, when more individuals come together to form a team, there is a chance that there might be dominating personalities in the group. This would cause difficulties among the group unless a leader is determined to manage the team. Now, this is the main problem here, as there is no formality of structure defined. Resulting in the dispute between managers and scientists. To avoid any further dispute formal structure must be laid out and a leader should be appointed amongst them.
Learn more on cross-functional team here: brainly.com/question/1490525
Answer:
xcmm this question made me think
Explanation:
LOL
The statement that is being described is a part of public relations. It is because the public relations' function is to be able to maintain their image with of the company, organization or to the public. They maintain this relationship in order to display a positive image and to be able to be known to the public and to have a strong support or bond that they want to have or accomplish.
