1.Research:Explore the websites provided to gather information on two landmark Supreme Court cases in order to compare the arguments for and against judicial restraint and judicial activism.
2.Write:Write an essay that compares and contrasts judicial activism and judicial restraint and presents your opinion on the debate surrounding these two philosophies.To get the best grade possible, follow the instructions in the assignment closely and answer all the questions completely. This assignment is worth 20 points.Use the provided websites to conduct research and answer the questions below. Your research will be critical to gathering the information necessary to write your essay. This section is worth 8 points.
1. Explain judicial restraint and the kinds of situations when it often comes into play. (1 point)Judicial restraint is where the judge limits the exercise of their own power and it comes into play when thejudge defers the issue to an elected official in the legislative or executive branches.
2. Explain judicial activism and the kinds of situations when it often comes into play. (1 point)Judicial activism is where the judge decides based on his/her opinion of what is best. These kinds of situations often occur when the judge tries to protect individual interests.
Info icon Subscribe to view the full document.
Subscribe to Unlock Right Arrow Icon
3. Explain the main arguments for and against judicial restraint. (1 point)For judicial restraintAgainst judicial restraintThe Constitution can only be interpreted by strict constructionist approachThe Constitution or laws made by legislature can be bague and be interpreted in different ways.
East and West Germany became the most prosperous economy in Europe. Under Chancellor Konrad Adenauer. !!! XD take care
Answer: the correct answer is D) Individuals may post private identifiable information about themselves on-line without intending it to be public and available to researchers.
Explanation: Handling private information is a delicate issue and personal information has to be treated with care.
Answer:
Yes, the government can take her property.
Explanation:
The government can take Nancy's property because it has eminent domain over the property. In other words, it means that the government can take private property and make it a public giving the owner compensation for the land. Besides, there has to be a public purpose for the eminent domain over the plot; which, could be the construction of roads, railroads, or public buildings.
It is not always good to expect from people. There is much more satisfaction in expecting more from yourself when you know that you can do more. Learn to be independent. We are free humans, safe from slavery unlike in the old days. There is much more freedom available for a majority of the people around the world. Therefore, one must take advantage of this. Learn to stand on your own feet, and look for people who can actually be available and will be concerned with your personal problems. Maybe you are the one who can help them before they can help you. It is a give and take situation sometimes.