William Ibbs, a professor at the university of California at Berkeley, found that high project management maturity results in lower direct costs of project management.
Project management is the process of directing the work of a team to achieve all project goals within given constraints. This information is typically documented in the project documentation created at the beginning of the development process. The main constraints are scope, time and budget.
Project management is the application of processes, methods, skills, knowledge and experience to achieve specific project objectives within agreed parameters and according to project acceptance criteria. Project management has the end result of being constrained by tight time frames and budgets.
Learn more about project management here:brainly.com/question/17310758
#SPJ4
Answer:
it will be a net loss of 560,000
It is better to produce at a loss of 60,000 than a loss of 620,000
That's because, the Division cover a good portion of their allocate fixed cost.
Explanation:
The fixed expense are allocate cost. Are unavoidable cost It will remain even if the division is dropped.
The sales and variable cost will be zero.
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&Continued&Discontinued&Differential\\Sales&1,200,000&0&-1,200,000\\Variable&-640,000&0&640,000\\Allocate cost&-620,000&-620,000&0\\Result&-60,000&-620,000&-560,000\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26Continued%26Discontinued%26Differential%5C%5CSales%261%2C200%2C000%260%26-1%2C200%2C000%5C%5CVariable%26-640%2C000%260%26640%2C000%5C%5CAllocate%20cost%26-620%2C000%26-620%2C000%260%5C%5CResult%26-60%2C000%26-620%2C000%26-560%2C000%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
After posting the values, we calculate the differential income.
In this case it will be a loss for 560,000
Answer:
Total value of the investment= $57,320.73
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to calculate the future value of the first part of the investment. We will calculate the future value for the monthly deposit for five years and then the lump sum for another five years.</u>
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= monthly deposit
i= 0.04/12= 0.003333
n= 5*12= 60 months
FV= {322*[(1.003333^60) - 1]} / 0.003333
FV= $21,348.05
<u>For the lump sum:</u>
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
n= 12*5= 60
i= 0.05/12= 0.004167
FV= 21,348.05*(1.004167^60)
FV= $27,397.75
<u>Now, the future value of the second part of the investment:</u>
<u></u>
n= 60
i= 0.0041667
A= 440
FV= {440*[(1.004167^60) - 1]} / 0.004167
FV= $29,922.98
Total value of the investment= 27,397.75 + 29,922.98
Total value of the investment= $57,320.73
Answer:
A. 300
Explanation:
The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
= 
where,
Annual demand = 600 bottles × 50 weeks = 30,000 bottles
Carrying cost per bottle = $50 × 40% = $20
And, the ordering cost per order is $30
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= 
= 300 bottles
Hence, option A is correct
