The Kubler Ross Model is usually experienced by people who lost their loved ones or people who are close to death because of a terminal illness or other related circumstances. The stage of Kubler Ross Model that is being shown above is the bargaining stage. It is where an individual tries to negotiate in exchanging for prolonging the person's existence. It could be seen above as Jorgen says that he will only be good or in other words, accept his fate when he has visited Sweden.
Answer: In the turmoil surrounding the unpopular Vietnam War, lowering the national voting age became a controversial topic. Responding to arguments that those old enough to be drafted for military service, should be able to exercise the right to vote, Congress lowered the voting age as part of the Voting Rights Act of 1970.
Explanation: hopes this helps
Answer: Option A
Explanation:
Culture is learned.it is not instinct. It is way of life of people. It plays a huge role in their behavior. In some culture, women believe the covering of the female body and therefore learn how to cover their body by making clothes that will do that. It's not instinct that just comes into play. Most children see their parents gets up in the morning and pray, others learn from their parents by seeing or asking why they eat together and they begin to practice it. That is culture. Instinct is inbuilt in man.it is a behaviorial respond to stimuli by man.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
The correct answer c my peeps
