Here you go plz mark brainlist
Answer:
The team did not adequately formalize the software's design
Explanation:
The most logical reason for this confusion is the fact that the team did not adequately formalize the the software design.
The design approach has to do with clearly defining the architectural modules of the application. The requirements in the software requirement specification document would serve as input for the next phase. The documents are prepared and they give a definition of the overall system architecture.
The team got confused because they did not go through this phase of the 10-phase SDLC model.
Answer:
Explanation:
The following code is written in Java. I created both versions of the program that was described in the question. The outputs can be seen in the attached images below. Both versions are attached as txt files below as well.
<span class="sg-text sg-text--link sg-text--bold sg-text--link-disabled sg-text--blue-dark">
txt
</span>
<span class="sg-text sg-text--link sg-text--bold sg-text--link-disabled sg-text--blue-dark">
txt
</span>
Answer:
The statement would be true
.
Explanation:
let, L = is a NFL player
M = teaches in CSU
N = has tattoos
Given that:
nfl player who teaches in csu = L^ M (this is false every time)
Above statement is L ^ M -> N
this would be true because
false -> true (true
)
false -> false (true
)
Second exp:
There are no players who teach in Csu therefore if we say they all have tattoos statement would be true.
What is responsible or who is responsible?
