Question 30(Multiple Choice Worth 2 points) [OU.04]One meteorologist believes that global warming has caused a significant chang
e in the global weather pattern. One biologist believes that global warming has not made any significant change in the global ecosystem. Which of these statements best explains why the meteorologist and biologist have different views on global warming? Most data on global warming are inaccurate. Scientific data changes every time it is tested. Different scientists use different data for investigation. Scientists from different backgrounds interpret data differently.
I believe the answer is: Different scientists use different data for investigation. I say that because different scientists have different equipment, ideas, and have different methods. I hope I was right and i hope it helped and i wasn't to late to answer this question.
Scientists from different backgrounds interpret data differently.
Explanation:
The main difference that both scientists will read data in a different way because they have different backgrounds and they will interpret that scientific data differently, for example the metereologist can see that the global warming is alarming because of the several typhoons and natural disasters happening around the globe, but the biologist can diminish the effects on global warming because the number of especies in danger of extinction is not growing.
It does in fact that's really what natural selection is all about it uses the characteristics that would better help the organism survive therefore making the species thrive
