Answer:
Future value = 16007.81437
Explanation:
we have to compound all the rates for the time period together as the 7,750 as exposed to this rate and their interest generated in one period are taking into consideration for the subsequent period interest calculations.
We multiply them and get the future value factor:
we now can solve for future value:
Future value = 16007.81437
False. A family's resources are limited.
The answer to the question is (A) a direct incentive.
A direct incentive refers to <em>a type of incentive that is given in order to cause an action to occur. </em>
A direct incentive is generally tangible to the person who is targeted by it. In contrast, its opposite, an indirect incentive refers to a type of incentive that a person receives indirectly by choosing to do something. It is usually less tangible than a direct incentive.
Answer:
Average rate of return= 10.17
%
Geometric return = 9.23%
Explanation:
<em>Geometric average return</em>
This is compounded annual rate of return which is used to measure the performance of an asset over a certain number of years. It helps to measure the return generated by an investment taking into account the volatility .
Unlike the arithmetic average the geometric average gives an idea of the real rate taking into account of volatility
The formula below
Geometric Return =(1+r1) (1+r2) ...... (1+rn)^1/n
Geometric Average return =
(1.12× 1.19× 1.21× 0.88× 1.26× 0.95)^(1/6) - 1 =0.09233168
Geometric return =0.0923
× 100= 9.23%
Geometric return = 9.23%
Average rate of return
<em>The average return is the sum of the returns over the years dividend by the Numbers of returns</em>
Average return = sum of return / No of returns
(12% + 19% + 21% + (12%) + 26% + (5%))/6 =10.17
%
Average rate of return= 10.17
%
Geometric return = 9.23%
Answer:
$190,000
; $228,000
Explanation:
Accounting Cost:
= Salary of Jill + Labor costs + Insurance and mortgage payment
= $60,000 + $90,000 + $40,000
= $190,000
Economic Cost:
= Accounting Cost + Investment return lost + Loss in Salary + Loss in Rent
= $190,000 + $8,000 + ($80,000 - $60,000) + ($50,000 - $40,000)
= $228,000
Therefore, accounting and economic costs are $190,000 and $228,000, respectively.
