Answer: the third answer
Step-by-step explanation:
did it online right now
Answer:
Option d is correct.
Vertical angles are congruent;
SAS
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
, 
In ΔNKJ and ΔMLK
and [Side] {Given}
Vertical angles states that the two lines intersect to make an X, angles on opposite sides of the X are called vertical angles.
i.e
and
are vertical angles.
Also, vertical angles are congruent.
[Angle] [Vertical angles are congruent]
SAS(Side-Angle-Side) postulate states that if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.
then, by SAS postulates;
Hence proved!
Therefore:
Statement Reason
1.
,
Given
2.
Vertical angles are congruent
3.
SAS
Answer: 3.19444 or 3.19 yards both of them are same.
1 INCH⇒ 0.0277778
* Hope this helps!! :) Mark me the Brainliest.
Go to google they have the answer
The statement that is not true for goodness-of-fit tests is: A. Expected frequencies must be whole numbers.
<h3>What is Goodness-of-fit tests?</h3>
Goodness-of-fit tests can be defined as the test conducted to help find out whether the observe value work hand in hand with expected value or the observe value is different from the expected value.
The statement is not true because it is not must for expected frequencies to be whole number despite the fact that expected frequencies are whole numbers.
Therefore the statement that is not true for goodness-of-fit tests is: A. Expected frequencies must be whole numbers.
Learn more about Goodness-of-fit tests here:brainly.com/question/16910222
#SPJ1