There are at least three reasons why historians might conclude that Christianity appealed more to many Romans than the old Roman religion did. We must remember that these are ideas that historians propose and not necessarily those that religious people would accept. Actual Romans might have said they preferred Christianity because God spoke to their hearts and told them it was true. Historians have to be more cynical and look for worldly causes for religious belief.
One reason that Romans might have liked Christianity is because its god cared about people. Roman religion was based on transactions. If people performed certain actions, the gods would perform other actions in return. It was like buying something on Amazon. By contrast, in Christianity, God loves all people regardless of what they do or believe. God hopes that people will do the right thing and will punish them if they do wrong, but he loves them as individuals even when they do bad things. Historians say that Romans might have liked this idea because it fed their emotional need to feel that they were valuable and worth caring about.
A second factor in Christianity’s popularity might have been its moral code. Roman religion really did not say much if anything about how people should act in their daily lives. The gods did not care how people acted towards one another. The Christian god, on the other hand, handed down a strict set of rules about how people were to behave. This might have made people like Christianity because it made them feel that they had instructions about how to live their lives.
Finally, historians emphasize Christianity’s inclusive nature. The Roman world was very unequal. There were a few elites, a group of people who were well-off, and many, many poor people and slaves. The Roman religion did not give any of the people of the lower classes a sense that they were valuable. This is where Christianity was so different. It taught that all people are equal in the eyes of God. Historians believe that this would have made many people like the idea of Christianity because it gave them hope that god cared about them regardless of their status and that they, the “meek” would one day inherit the earth.
Historians suggest all of these as reasons why people in Roman times might have been attracted to Christianity.
Zachman Framework is a model that asks the traditional fact-finding questions in a systems development context.
<h3>What is Zachman Framework?</h3>
A essential building block for enterprise architecture, the Zachman Framework offers a formal and systematic manner of seeing and defining an enterprise. It is an enterprise ontology. An ontology is a two-dimensional classification system that represents the meeting point of two previous classifications.
The first set of questions are basic inquisitive ones: What, How, When, Who, Where, and Why. The second is drawn from the philosophical idea of reification, which is when an abstract idea is converted into an instantiation. The identification, definition, representation, specification, configuration, and instantiation transformations are part of the Zachman Framework reification process.
To learn more about Zachman Framework visit:
brainly.com/question/13175102
#SPJ4
If the baby's parents sue happy days, they will be liable for: <span>negligent hiring
The Happy days day care has proven to hire an incompetent worker without doing a thorough background check on him/her before the initial hire. (simply asking the applicant is insufficient)
Their action has cause danger to the customers that may threaten their lives.</span>
To help cope with the negative psychological consequences of being held captive, a person (particularly in the military setting) should strive to:
<span>Have faith that the U.S. government will support his/her family
Reaffirm his/her will to live and focus on positive reasons to return home
Keep his/her mind active by recalling fond memories or designing a house
The first is to build up faith so as to allow the person to continue to hope. The second and third help to keep the mind preoccupied and strengthen his/her will and determination to get through the obstacle. </span>
<span>Jerome operates under heteronomous morality while Hani is operating under autonomous morality. Under Jerome's schema, the outcome of the action and the rules of the world determine the morality of an action, without understanding the intentions or the mitigating factors that might be at play. Autonomous morality, however, sees that there are shades of grey to every situation and that morality does not always require a punishment for every action or transgression.</span>
