Answer: Rights
Explanation:
Rights approach is the aspect through which dignity and respect for any individual is focused.This approach defines about freedom of person to live as they want, freely opting their choice in different fields, should respect each other in moral manner, respect dignity of other people etc.
According to the question,a method in which result of any action is not focused rather action is seen through morals and dignity perspective .Thus, it is considered as wrong or right in partial manner in itself.
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Answer:
D) "Requirements to be in Georgia House of Representives"
Explanation:
Just Trust Me
Well the Yangtze River when you translate it (I know I am Chinese) it ends in the East China Sea north of Shanghai. <span />
The answer would be The Soviet Union^.^
