Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Could you type out the information? It is not legible in the photo. I can answer it for you then.
Answer:
Democracy (Greek: δημοκρατία, dēmokratiā, from dēmos 'people' and kratos 'rule') refers to a form of government in which the people either have the authority to choose their governing legislators, or the authority to decide on legislation.
Explanation:
Hope this helps you
B) presidential; president
Answer: ETHNOCENTRISM
Explanation: The word "ethnocentrism", is derived from the Greek word ethnos meaning "nation, people, or cultural grouping" and the Latin word centric meaning "center"
Ethnocentrism can be defined as the act of judging another culture from the perspective of one's own adoptive ethnic culture.
This is largely done based on the belief that one's own cultural standard and values are superior.