Among the choices the one that is correct is letter B which is "<span>The trial would begin in state-level appellate and go to the federal court of appeal if the verdict is challenged."
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
</span>
A claim which is not defensible is saying that: D. George W. Bush is not as talented as his father, George H. W. Bush.
<h3>What is a claim?</h3>
A claim simply refers to a statement that is used by a writer or speaker to prove, substantiate, defend and support an argument. Thus, it's an assertive statement that is expressed by a writer, so as to prove that an argument is either true or real.
In this scenario, an indefensible claim is saying that George W. Bush is not as talented as his father, George H. W. Bush because it is actually a proven statement of fact.
Read more on claims here: brainly.com/question/22676015
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is embodied cognition.
Explanation:
The theory of embodied cognition states that the body plays a major role in experiencing cognitive processes. This means that the way we process information is not only dependent on our brains, but our body as a whole. For example, our ability to experience physical stimulus such as warmth and cold also influences the way we interpret other non-physical situations, such as feeling excluded at a party.
The British taxed the colonists in order to pay its debt.
Answer:
A correlation is only a mathematical means of describing the relationship between variables. When it is a positive correlation, it means when the value of one increases, for example, the value of the other variable also increases or when one decreases, so does the other. A negative correlation would show that as one variable increases in value, the other decreases. These relationships are non-causal as you're not manipulating variables to control them to see what is causing this relationship. Sometimes, non-causal covariance (or variables that don't have an effect on each other vary cooincidentally in a pattern-like fashion, when there is actually another variable causing the relationship going on.
Explanation:
In the case of this example, it is doubtful that having money causes you to have a higher grade point average. So while we see an increase in grade point average with those who have high income it could be due to other factors, like people with more money have access to learning tools, tutors and other things that people with less money don't have access to. So it is access to tools, not money that is actually causing a difference. There are likely dozens if not hundreds of other potential confounded variables that could be causing this observation.
