ANSWER:
An operational definition of aggression:
A group of peers are allowed to play and have fun, for about 30mins. This will help them to be in the same state of mind. After the 30mins time, each person's aggression level was measured, as it's assumed that their are all in the same state of mind. The measurement was done by using abusive words on them to record how their will behave. Those that did not react or has a very mild reaction to it were recorded to have zero to 1 level of aggression, which is known as low aggression level. Those that reacted to the abuse by abusing back or forbidden the abuse, without shouting or being harsh were recorded to have 2 to 4 level of aggression, which is known as medium aggression level. While those that reacted in a harsh manner by shouting and abusing back in a manner that shows their are ready to fight, were recorded to have 5 to 10 level of aggression, which is known as high level of aggression.
The measurement used in this example is Categorical and the type of measure been used called Behavioral measure.
Well you could look at their body language, like, the Goat is looking in a different direction from the camera so something has got it's attention, wether it can smell something interesting like food or it saw something like a mouse, it's up to you. The 2 boys in the picture are looking at the camera, suggesting that the person behind the camera could have said something like, "cheese" or "smile for the photo". The boy in the right looks like he might not have been too happy about the picture however the boy in the left, since he's smiling, he may be happy. Also the boy in the right has his hands together in a kind of close position which could suggest he isn't enjoying what he is doing. The only limit is your imagination. You can come up with a scenario by looking at facial expression or body language. Like if someone frowned at you and just froze. You could interpret that either they are angry at you for some reason or they could be in shock of seeing you.
Answer:
c.The leaders of the Haitian Revolution came from a different social classes than did the leaders of the French revolution
Explanation:
While the French revolution had the idea of a better life for all people, including the low classed people who differed from unemployment and hunger, <u>the leaders weren’t those from the low class</u><u>.</u> <u>All of the prominent names that are associated with leading the French revolution (Maximilien Robespierre, Marquis de Lafayette, Jacques Pierre Brissot, Georges Danton, etc.) </u>were educated people, scholars, sometimes coming from the higher classes.
However, <u>the Haitian revolution was mostly led by low-class people, most of whom were ex-slaves</u><u>.</u> Toussaint Louverture, the general who is thought to be the most prominent leader of the revolution, was<u> born into a slave family, have not been formally educated, and was a worker prior to his time in the military.</u>
Answer:
speculation.
Explanation:
Democritus was a pre-Socratic philosopher. Like all philosophers who share this label, they mostly engaged in a kind of thought governed by speculation in search of governing doctrines, in specific a peculiar form of speculation, that is to say, a kind of informed and well-reasoned imaginative effort based on no empirical or demonstrable principles. One such speculative doctrine is his theory of atoms which holds great resemblance with the modern day conception of atoms that we have today, though they are based on extremely different arguments and, in the case of the Greek philosopher, no observable phenomena.
Answer:
case study
Explanation:
<u>Case study is a research methodology in science especially in social science. It is an in-depth intensive and systematic investigation of a case i.e. a person, a group, a community, or a unit</u>. It help researchers to describe the complexity of a phenomenon in a natural setting.
