Answer:
1-For this situation, we can see that the Independent factors are the activities of the respondent, onlooker declaration, representative proclamation, and forensic proof.
2-The needy factors are the litigant reactions, proof assessment, legal evaluations, and judge sees on the grounds that these factors rely upon the IVs.
3-My speculation as per this case will be. "Does the homicide was basic for burglary and is respondent defending proof". Right now, can finish up all the factors and information gathered from various assets.
The answer is: Expert
Expert testimony is a form of testimony that come from people who have deep knowledge and experience in a certain issue. This type of testimony usually regarded very highly in the court and has higher chance to convince the juries to a certain opinion.
(examples of expert testimony are: testimony regarding fake internet account from IT experts, testimony about violent behavior from psychologists, etc)
Here are some choices:
a point or line common to lines or surfaces that intersect.
a point at which two or more things intersect
an action of intersecting
