The statement "The inhabitants of the United States have...properly speaking, no literature." is inaccurate. Literature may work through grammar syntax and semantics but there is no existing standards that would make a piece of work qualify as literature. There is only different levels and complexity but no absolute requirement.
<span>While I was changing my shirt, I d**n near gave my kid sister Phoebe a buzz, though. I certainly felt like talking to her on the phone. Somebody with sense and all. But I couldn't take a chance on giving her a buzz, because she was only a little kid and she wouldn't have been up, let alone anywhere near the phone. I thought of maybe hanging up if my parents answered, but that wouldn't've worked, either. They'd know it was me. My mother always knows it's me. She's psychic. But I certainly wouldn't have minded shooting the cr*p with old Phoebe for a while.</span>
Answer:
The tiger, a symbol of fearless power, is angry and agonizing because of his confinement, and would much rather be free in the wild. The beast has been turned into a docile creature to the amusement of humans, and the tone in Norris´ poem indicates that it´s a sad situation that should not happen.
Explanation:
"A Tiger in the Zoo" is a poem by George Leslie Norris (1921-2006). Based on his work, Norris would most likely agree that animals have the right to freedom and should not be caged, because his description of a caged tiger reveals his feelings about the matter. All animals have the right to be free, especially when their confinement is only aimed at entertainment in disregard of animals' rights.
Can we see the sentences, please?
Assuming the author is the speaker is the best option. Also, reading the peom out loud is another strategy.
