Answer:
The appropriate test to use is independent t-test (also known as two sample t-test) in order to make a comparison between the means of the two independent groups used in the study.
Explanation:
In designing the study, independent t-test can be used to evaluate the statistical difference between the mean of half of the department population using the old policy, and the mean of the other remaining half of the population using the new policy in order to evaluate their understanding of both (constituting a broad range) appropriate and inappropriate behaviors in the workplace. The statistical result will provide evidence that would indicate whether a new organizational policy on sexual harassment is effective.
Answer:
Explanation:
<u>JUDGEMENT ABOUT MORAL FACTS: </u>
Moral judgment is a realm in which a person feels elevated self from another kingdom such as animal kingdom and controls their mind as other animals can't do which is different from brain functioning. our decision makes us special from others because this is only the fact which determines our next world. young et.al experimented moral judgment.
<u>JUDGEMENT ABOUT PHYSICAL FACTS:</u>
There are many types of treatment we used with other people and sometimes that judgment turned towards ourselves leading to the feeling of shame, low self-esteem.
<u>Judging someone else includes:</u>
- Avoiding that person
- Making fun of that person
- Seeing them as attention seekers
- Talk ill about that person
- Using abusive language to hurt them
- Mentally harassment
I believe the answer is: broken glass.
This proof that the grouping/representing process of a certain events or objects. This process usually resulted in the creation of words or actions that would ignite other memory due to its relevance. (in the example above, it's the word 'smahed' and actual broken glass.<span />
The positive aspect is the moralty and exploitative nature of stereotypes
Answer:
Collaborative inhibition.
Explanation:
As the exercise suggests, collaborative inhibition happens when, for example, recalling items together, the retrieval strategies used by individual members of the group disrupt those used by others. Therefore, this phenomenon happens when a group of individuals who are together remember less information than the same quantity of individuals would remember if they worked alone. For example, if a group of 4 students had to remember the assigment in full detail, if collaborative inhibition happens, they would disrupt the information among themselves making the same 4 students, separated, more capable of remembering the information.
