<span>This is criticizing the speaker. This makes it difficult to effectively listen when the listener already knows that there is a fact or point that is going to be used against the speaker. In addition, by interrupting, the rest of the points that might be made by Sven are lost in her rebuttal.</span>
I agree with these perspectives on the grounds that there are a few situations where an individual planned to follow up on a good aim however the result wasn't right and here and there an individual expect to act awful after something and the activity ended up being great. My point is that occasionally unexpected things can happen and cause a change to a condition that we have no power in. I trust that an individual ought to be judged in light of their expectations, not their activities.
Answer:
qualitative research
Explanation:
Richard, a research scholar, wanted to do a research study in a subject which does not have a lot of preexisting knowledge. SO he will have to ask basic question to his research subjects in order to get an overall idea about the topic. By doing such he will be able to gain a basic knowledge about the subject he had chosen.
Qualitative research is done to obtain or which aims at expanding and gaining knowledge by asking basic question research participants related to the subjects.
Thus the answer is qualitative research.
