Answer:
A. Industrial Revolution was most significant in prompting the development of socialism
Explanation:
Socialism is regarded as the doctrine of sociological and political aspects for both public and private ownership that controls natural resources and property. Based on the view of the socialist individuals should not work under isolation.
Further, everything that is produced by individuals is regarded as a social product, and each one who contributes towards socialism has a social share. Therefore it is the responsibility of the society in general have control of properties o benefit all its members.
Explanation:
Donate Clothes. Believe it or not, the throwing away of clothing is one of the biggest contributions we make to landfills today. ...
Reduce Food Waste
Eat Healthily
Save Leftovers for Next Day.
Buy Things With Less Packaging.
Boycott Plastic Water Bottles.
Just Don't Buy as Much Stuff
Recycle.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
What responsibilities, if any, do Americans have to promote representative democracy and constitutional government in other nations?
The United States has no responsibility to promote democracy in other countries because that would be intromission in other nations. In today's world, that is not acceptable. Every country is autonomous and has its own right to establish the best form of government their citizens approve.
What the US can do is to be an example of a democratic government by its actions and legislation. It can show other countries the possibilities that democracy offers. However, every country has its own problems and challenges, including the US. That is why it is important to respect the sovereignty of each country.
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
Karma there’s good karma and bad karma
